[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:12:03 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Thu, 07/02 18:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 01:46:26PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:35:24PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On 06/30/2015 11:06 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > virtio_net_receive still does the check by calling
> > > > virtio_net_can_receive, if the device or driver is not ready, the packet
> > > > is dropped.
> > > >
> > > > This is necessary because returning false from can_receive complicates
> > > > things: the peer would disable sending until we explicitly flush the
> > > > queue.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > > > ---
> > > > hw/net/virtio-net.c | 1 -
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > index d728233..dbef0d0 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > > @@ -1503,7 +1503,6 @@ static int virtio_net_load_device(VirtIODevice
> > > > *vdev, QEMUFile *f,
> > > > static NetClientInfo net_virtio_info = {
> > > > .type = NET_CLIENT_OPTIONS_KIND_NIC,
> > > > .size = sizeof(NICState),
> > > > - .can_receive = virtio_net_can_receive,
> > > > .receive = virtio_net_receive,
> > > > .link_status_changed = virtio_net_set_link_status,
> > > > .query_rx_filter = virtio_net_query_rxfilter,
> > >
> > > A side effect of this patch is it will read and then drop packet is
> > > guest driver is no ok.
> >
> > I think that the semantics of .can_receive() and .receive() return
> > values are currently incorrect in many NICs. They have .can_receive()
> > functions that return false for conditions where .receive() would
> > discard the packet. So what happens is that packets get queued when
> > they should actually be discarded.
> >
> > The purpose of the flow control (queuing) mechanism is to tell the
> > sender to hold off until the receiver has more rx buffers available.
> > It's a short-term thing that doesn't included link down, rx disable, or
> > NIC reset states.
> >
> > Therefore, I think this patch will not introduce a regression. It is
> > adjusting the code to stop queuing packets when they should actually be
> > dropped.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>
> OK, but we do have transient out of buffers states too, and
> virtio_net_can_receive checks these as well.
>
> To me, it looks like we should change virtio_net_can_receive to
> avoid checking link down state, etc.
> But I don't see why we should remove it completely.
OK, it makse sense to check buffer state.
Fam
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2015/07/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive, Jason Wang, 2015/07/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive, Jason Wang, 2015/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2015/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: Drop net_virtio_info.can_receive, Jason Wang, 2015/07/13