Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: Fix qemu_opt_get_bool() crash in host_memory_backend_init()

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:02:14PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:39:17 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > This fixes the following crash, introduced by commit
> > 49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6:
> > 
> >   $ gdb --args qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc,mem-merge=off -object
> > memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node0,size=1024 [...]
> >   Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> >   (gdb) bt
> >   #0  0x00007ffff253b8c7 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #1  0x00007ffff253d52a in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #2  0x00007ffff253446d in __assert_fail_base () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #3  0x00007ffff2534522 in  () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> >   #4  0x00005555558bb80a in qemu_opt_get_bool_helper
> > (opts=0x55555621b650, address@hidden "mem-merge",
> > address@hidden, address@hidden) at
> > qemu/util/qemu-option.c:388 #5  0x00005555558bbb5a in
> > qemu_opt_get_bool (opts=<optimized out>,
> > address@hidden "mem-merge", address@hidden)
> > at qemu/util/qemu-option.c:398 #6  0x0000555555720a24 in
> > host_memory_backend_init (obj=0x5555562ac970) at
> > qemu/backends/hostmem.c:226
> > 
> > Instead of using qemu_opt_get_bool(), that didn't work with
> > qemu_machine_opts for a long time, we can use the machine QOM
> > properties directly.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  backends/hostmem.c | 9 +++++----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/backends/hostmem.c b/backends/hostmem.c
> > index 61c1ac0..38a32ed 100644
> > --- a/backends/hostmem.c
> > +++ b/backends/hostmem.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >   * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> >   */
> >  #include "sysemu/hostmem.h"
> > +#include "hw/boards.h"
> >  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> >  #include "qapi-types.h"
> >  #include "qapi-visit.h"
> > @@ -223,10 +224,10 @@ static void host_memory_backend_init(Object
> > *obj) {
> >      HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);
> >  
> > -    backend->merge = qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
> > -                                       "mem-merge", true);
> > -    backend->dump = qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
> > -                                      "dump-guest-core", true);
> > +    backend->merge =
> > object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(current_machine),
> maybe use qdev_get_machine() instead of OBJECT(current_machine)

What are the advantages you see in the extra layers of indirection of
qdev_get_machine()? (I am not against your proposal, but I would like to
understand the point of qdev_get_machine() yet.)

I'd prefer to use something that is guaranteed to be MachineState*,
qdev_get_machine() returns Object*. I am even considering using
current_machine->mem_merge and current_machine->dump_guest_core directly
instead of object_property_get_bool(). That would mean extra
compile-time checks, instead of runtime ones.

-- 
Eduardo