qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: Fix qemu_opt_get_bool() crash in host_


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hostmem: Fix qemu_opt_get_bool() crash in host_memory_backend_init()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:06:01 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0

On 07/20/2015 11:03 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:06:28AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:33:55 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:02:14PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:39:17 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

This fixes the following crash, introduced by commit
49d2e648e8087d154d8bf8b91f27c8e05e79d5a6:

   $ gdb --args qemu-system-x86_64 -machine pc,mem-merge=off -object
memory-backend-ram,id=ram-node0,size=1024 [...]
   Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
   (gdb) bt
   #0  0x00007ffff253b8c7 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
   #1  0x00007ffff253d52a in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
   #2  0x00007ffff253446d in __assert_fail_base () at /lib64/libc.so.6
   #3  0x00007ffff2534522 in  () at /lib64/libc.so.6
   #4  0x00005555558bb80a in qemu_opt_get_bool_helper
(opts=0x55555621b650, address@hidden "mem-merge",
address@hidden, address@hidden) at
qemu/util/qemu-option.c:388 #5  0x00005555558bbb5a in
qemu_opt_get_bool (opts=<optimized out>,
address@hidden "mem-merge", address@hidden)
at qemu/util/qemu-option.c:398 #6  0x0000555555720a24 in
host_memory_backend_init (obj=0x5555562ac970) at
qemu/backends/hostmem.c:226

Instead of using qemu_opt_get_bool(), that didn't work with
qemu_machine_opts for a long time, we can use the machine QOM
properties directly.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
---
  backends/hostmem.c | 9 +++++----
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/backends/hostmem.c b/backends/hostmem.c
index 61c1ac0..38a32ed 100644
--- a/backends/hostmem.c
+++ b/backends/hostmem.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
   * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
   */
  #include "sysemu/hostmem.h"
+#include "hw/boards.h"
  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
  #include "qapi-types.h"
  #include "qapi-visit.h"
@@ -223,10 +224,10 @@ static void host_memory_backend_init(Object
*obj) {
      HostMemoryBackend *backend = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);

-    backend->merge = qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
-                                       "mem-merge", true);
-    backend->dump = qemu_opt_get_bool(qemu_get_machine_opts(),
-                                      "dump-guest-core", true);
+    backend->merge =
object_property_get_bool(OBJECT(current_machine),
maybe use qdev_get_machine() instead of OBJECT(current_machine)

What are the advantages you see in the extra layers of indirection of
qdev_get_machine()? (I am not against your proposal, but I would like to
understand the point of qdev_get_machine() yet.)
current_machine might be NULL where as qdev_get_machine() always returns
/machine object.

In this case, I don't want "/machine" to be created as a generic
container object by accident because it must be a MachineState object.
If /machine is not initialized yet, that code should abort instead of
trying to continue.

But that can be solved by simply ensuring qdev_get_machine() is a
TYPE_MACHINE object (see below).



I'd prefer to use something that is guaranteed to be MachineState*,
qdev_get_machine() returns Object*. I am even considering using
current_machine->mem_merge and current_machine->dump_guest_core directly
instead of object_property_get_bool(). That would mean extra
compile-time checks, instead of runtime ones.
Check difference 'git grep qdev_get_machine' vs 'git grep current_machine'.
I was under impression that policy was trying no to use globals unless one has 
to,
and not introduce new usage in presence of other means to get object.


I will send a new version using:

   MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
   backend->merge = machine_mem_merge(machine);
   backend->dump = machine_dump_guest_core(machine);

Then we have no global variable, type safety, and no direct access to
struct fields.
+1
I am considering retiring curent_machine global variable for 2.5.

Thanks,
Marcel






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]