qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ARM SMBIOS V1 PATCH 0/6] SMBIOS Support for ARM


From: Laszlo Ersek
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ARM SMBIOS V1 PATCH 0/6] SMBIOS Support for ARM
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:16:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0

On 07/28/15 08:00, Wei Huang wrote:
> SMBIOS tables present userful system hardware info to management
> applications, such as DMI tools. Even though SMBIOS was originally
> developed for Intel x86, it has been extended to both Itanium and 
> ARM (32bit & 64bit). More and more ARM server releases, such as 
> RHEL Server for ARM, start to integrate support for SMBIOS.
> 
> This patchset is intendted to provid SMBIOS tables for ARM mach-virt
> machine. The SMBIOS tables are created and stored in fw_cfg, relying on
> OVMF (AAVMF) to parse/present SMBIOS entry.
> 
> RFC version have been tested by Laszlo using his customized version of
> AAVMF. We were able to detect SMBIOS 2.8 tables using dmidecode inside
> an AArch64 guest VM. Moving forward, it is better to support SMBIOS 3.0
> for ARM guest VM. This new version (V1) integrates SMBIOS 3.0 support
> for ARM mach-virt. I have tested this version by forcing SMBIOS 2.1
> format (i.e. passing SMBIOS_21_ENTRY_POINT to smbios_set_defaults()).
> SMBIOS 3.0 hasn't been tested yet as it requires AAVMF to install 3.0 entry.
> 
> RFC->V1:
>  * Add SMBIOS 3.0 support for buidling SMBIOS
>  * Switch from SMBIOS 2.1 to 3.0 for ARM mach-virt
>  * RFC version Tested-by Laszlo Ersek and Acked-by Gabriel Somlo
> 
> Thanks,
> -Wei
> 
> Wei Huang (6):
>   smbios: extract x86 smbios building code into a function
>   smbios: remove dependency on x86 e820 tables
>   smbios: pass ram size as a parameter to build smbios tables
>   smbios: move smbios code into a common folder
>   smbios: add smbios 3.0 support
>   smbios: implement smbios support for mach-virt
> 
>  arch_init.c                          |  2 +-
>  default-configs/arm-softmmu.mak      |  1 +
>  default-configs/i386-softmmu.mak     |  1 +
>  default-configs/x86_64-softmmu.mak   |  1 +
>  hw/Makefile.objs                     |  1 +
>  hw/arm/virt.c                        | 24 +++++++++
>  hw/i386/Makefile.objs                |  2 +-
>  hw/i386/pc.c                         | 56 ++++++++++++++-------
>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c                    |  5 +-
>  hw/i386/pc_q35.c                     |  5 +-
>  hw/smbios/Makefile.objs              |  1 +
>  hw/{i386 => smbios}/smbios.c         | 96 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  include/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.h     |  1 +
>  include/hw/{i386 => smbios}/smbios.h | 42 ++++++++++++++--
>  tests/bios-tables-test.c             |  2 +-
>  vl.c                                 |  2 +-
>  16 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 hw/smbios/Makefile.objs
>  rename hw/{i386 => smbios}/smbios.c (93%)
>  rename include/hw/{i386 => smbios}/smbios.h (84%)
> 

I was hoping there would be a focused review from the subsystem
maintainers / feature owners for this patchset. Thus far only Shannon
commented on the series, plus I tested it and reported a small bug (with
a fix).

Peter: if I review this series (and version 2 that Wei is already
planning to post, in order to address the notes above, plus anything
that further review might turn up), will my review suffice for you to
apply this series (after 2.4 is out)?

If not, then everyone with jurisdiction (and those people are on the Cc
list I think), please consider this a ping. (A week has passed so it
shouldn't be too early.)

Thanks!
Laszlo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]