[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions
From: |
Chen Gang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Aug 2015 06:24:57 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
OK, thanks. What you said sounds reasonable to me. I shall try to send
patches to qemu, firstly.
:-)
On 8/19/15 06:15, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 August 2015 at 22:29, Chen Gang <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 8/18/15 22:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 18 August 2015 at 15:27, Chen Gang <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Welcome any ideas, suggestions and completions.
>>>
>>> You should stop working on adding new features and instructions,
>>> and concentrate on getting a coherent set of patches for some
>>> subset of the instruction set reviewed and into QEMU.
>>>
>>
>> OK, thanks. It sounds good. But I guess, it is not executable:
>>
>> - I have already send a set of patches, but they are not integrated
>> into qemu (or not reviewed).
>
> You need to concentrate on getting these in. That means:
> * check whether there are outstanding review comments
> (or trivial bugs you found yourself in the instructions
> covered by these parts) -- if so, then respin the patchset
> and resend it
> * 'ping' the patch series to remind people to review it
>
> (Specifically, IIRC, RTH needs to review the codegen bits of
> the integer patches.)
>
>> - I have to continue, although they are not integrated into (it means
>> I have to add new features and instructions, at present).
>
> If you do this then you are drawing the attention and time
> of reviewers away from the patches which are nearly ready
> to go into QEMU and towards the new stuff you post. This
> means that the older patchsets are less likely to move forward.
>
>> - For me, when tilegx qemu pass gcc testsuite, and finish floating
>> point insns in the preciser way, I guess, that is a reasonable point
>> to send new patches to qemu.
>
> This will result in a huge patchset which is very hard to
> review (and which is likely to get requests from me to
> split it up and send a smaller subset which is reviewable).
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Richard Henderson, 2015/08/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Chen Gang, 2015/08/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Richard Henderson, 2015/08/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Chen Gang, 2015/08/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Peter Maydell, 2015/08/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Chen Gang, 2015/08/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions, Peter Maydell, 2015/08/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] tilegx: About floating point instructions,
Chen Gang <=