Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Disas QOMification, round 2

[Peter Maydell]

On 28 August 2015 at 17:19, Peter Crosthwaite
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Longer term though, maybe these homogeneous every-arch change patterns
> should only need a critical mass of acks from the arch maintainers for
> the whole thing to go through. It's unlikely that I botched moxie with
> most of the other arches reviewed, so chasing that ack from the last
> maintainer might not be needed. That or a generic reviewer should be
> able to ack ones like this, and it's almost candidate for trivial.

I think that's reasonable. I don't have a great deal of sympathy
if the minor architectures break if they don't have maintainers
who are willing to actually stick around on qemu-devel and
review changes to their code, rather than just dumping a patchset
on us and vanishing.

-- PMM