qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci-testdev: add nodata test


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci-testdev: add nodata test
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:04:42 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0


On 08/27/2015 06:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Add nodata test where data length is ignored.
> Skip it for port IO since kvm does not support it there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/misc/pci-testdev.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/misc/pci-testdev.c b/hw/misc/pci-testdev.c
> index 26b9b86..b6e11d6 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/pci-testdev.c
> +++ b/hw/misc/pci-testdev.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ typedef struct IOTest {
>  
>  #define IOTEST_DATAMATCH 0xFA
>  #define IOTEST_NOMATCH   0xCE
> +#define IOTEST_NODATA  0xAB

This is never used.

>  
>  #define IOTEST_IOSIZE 128
>  #define IOTEST_MEMSIZE 2048
> @@ -52,7 +53,8 @@ typedef struct IOTest {
>  static const char *iotest_test[] = {
>      "no-eventfd",
>      "wildcard-eventfd",
> -    "datamatch-eventfd"
> +    "datamatch-eventfd",
> +    "nodata-eventfd"

For PIO test, "nodata-eventfd" actually means "nodata-noeventfd".

>  };
>  
>  static const char *iotest_type[] = {
> @@ -261,12 +263,19 @@ static void pci_testdev_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, 
> Error **errp)
>          memcpy(test->hdr->name, name, strlen(name) + 1);
>          g_free(name);
>          test->hdr->offset = cpu_to_le32(IOTEST_SIZE(i) + i * 
> IOTEST_ACCESS_WIDTH);
> -        test->size = IOTEST_ACCESS_WIDTH;
> -        test->match_data = strcmp(IOTEST_TEST(i), "wildcard-eventfd");
> +        test->size = strcmp(IOTEST_TEST(i), "nodata-eventfd") ? 
> IOTEST_ACCESS_WIDTH : 0;
> +
> +        test->match_data = strcmp(IOTEST_TEST(i), "wildcard-eventfd") &&
> +                             strcmp(IOTEST_TEST(i), "nodata-eventfd");
>          test->hdr->test = i;
>          test->hdr->data = test->match_data ? IOTEST_DATAMATCH : 
> IOTEST_NOMATCH;
>          test->hdr->width = IOTEST_ACCESS_WIDTH;
>          test->mr = IOTEST_REGION(d, i);
> +
> +        if (!test->size && !IOTEST_IS_MEM(i)) {
> +            test->hasnotifier = false;
> +            continue;
> +        }
>          if (!strcmp(IOTEST_TEST(i), "no-eventfd")) {
>              test->hasnotifier = false;
>              continue;

Since you're at this, how about introduce a test that mixes datamatch
and wildcard?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]