qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() upd


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/5] fw_cfg: document fw_cfg_modify_iXX() update functions
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 18:33:25 +0100

On 31 August 2015 at 10:10, Marc MarĂ­ <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: "Gabriel L. Somlo" <address@hidden>
>
> Document the behavior of fw_cfg_modify_iXX() for leak-less updating
> of integer-type blobs.
>
> Currently only fw_cfg_modify_i16() is coded, but 32- and 64-bit versions
> may be added later if necessary..
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> ---
>  docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> index 74351dd..5bc7b96 100644
> --- a/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> +++ b/docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> @@ -159,6 +159,17 @@ will convert a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to 
> little-endian, then add
>  a dynamically allocated copy of the appropriately sized item to fw_cfg
>  under the given selector key value.
>
> +== fw_cfg_modify_iXX() ==
> +
> +Modify the value of an XX-bit item (where XX may be 16, 32, or 64).
> +Similarly to the corresponding fw_cfg_add_iXX() function set, convert
> +a 16-, 32-, or 64-bit integer to little endian, create a dynamically
> +allocated copy of the required size, and replace the existing item at
> +the given selector key value with the newly allocated one. The previous
> +item, assumed to have been allocated during an earlier call to
> +fw_cfg_add_iXX() or fw_cfg_modify_iXX() (of the same width XX), is freed
> +before the function returns.
> +
>  == fw_cfg_add_file() ==
>
>  Given a filename (i.e., fw_cfg item name), starting pointer, and size,

This doesn't cover fw_cfg_modify_file(); is that intentional?

As an aside, shouldn't this function-level documentation be done
via doc-comments in the header file where the prototypes are
declared? (You don't need to move the docs around in this series,
but it might be nice to do at some point.)

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]