qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] [PATCH 2/2] sheepdog: refine discard support


From: Vasiliy Tolstov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] [PATCH 2/2] sheepdog: refine discard support
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:32:11 +0300


04 сент. 2015 г. 12:57 пользователь "Hitoshi Mitake" <address@hidden> написал:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Hitoshi Mitake <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> 2015-09-01 6:03 GMT+03:00 Hitoshi Mitake <address@hidden>:
> >>> This patch refines discard support of the sheepdog driver. The
> >>> existing discard mechanism was implemented on SD_OP_DISCARD_OBJ, which
> >>> was introduced before fine grained reference counting on newer
> >>> sheepdog. It doesn't care about relations of snapshots and clones and
> >>> discards objects unconditionally.
> >>>
> >>> With this patch, the driver just updates an inode object for updating
> >>> reference. Removing the object is done in sheep process side.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Teruaki Ishizaki <address@hidden>
> >>> Cc: Vasiliy Tolstov <address@hidden>
> >>> Cc: Jeff Cody <address@hidden>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <address@hidden>
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm test this patch and now discard working properly and no errors in
> >> sheepdog log file.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Vasiliy Tolstov <address@hidden>
> >
> > On the second thought, this patch has a problem of handling snapshot.
> > Please drop this one (1st patch is ok to apply).
> >
> > I'll solve the problem in sheepdog side.
>
> On the third thought, this patch can work well ;) Please pick this patch, Jeff.
>
> I considered about a case of interleaving of snapshotting and
> discarding requests like below:
> 1. user invokes dog vdi snapshot, a command for making current VDI
> snapshot (updating inode objects)
> 2. discard request from VM before the request of 1 completes
> 3. discard completes
> 4. request of 1 completes
>
> In this case, some data_vdi_id of original inode can be overwritten
> before completion of snapshotting. However, this behavior is valid
> because dog vdi snapshot doesn't return ack to the user.
>

This is normal for snapshots, to get consistent data you need to cooperate with guest system to get freeze it fs before snapshot.
Quemu-ga already have this via sending freeze to fs beforw and thaw after snapshot .

> Thanks,
> Hitoshi
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hitoshi
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Vasiliy Tolstov,
> >> e-mail: address@hidden
> >> --
> >> sheepdog mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> https://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]