qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: convert to SysBusDevice


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: convert to SysBusDevice object
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 18:57:37 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:

> On 7 September 2015 at 17:40, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Convert the pxa2xx_mmci device to be a sysbus device.
>
>>> +static Property pxa2xx_mmci_properties[] = {
>>> +    /* Note: pointer property 'drive' may remain NULL, thus no need
>>> +     * for dc->cannot_instantiate_with_device_add_yet = true;
>>> +     * Unfortunately this can't be a DEFINE_PROP_DRIVE, because
>>> +     * setting a 'drive' property results in a call to blk_attach_dev()
>>> +     * attaching the BlockBackend to this device; that then means that
>>> +     * the call in sd_init() to blk_attach_dev_nofail() which tries to
>>> +     * attach the BlockBackend to the SD card object aborts.
>>> +     */
>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_PTR("drive", PXA2xxMMCIState, blk),
>>> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> +};
>>
>> As far as I can tell, this problem is an artifact of our interface to
>> the common sd-card code, namely sd_init().  sd_init() was made for the
>> pre-qdev world: it creates and completely initializes the common
>> SDState.
>>
>> In qdev, we do this in three separate steps: create, set properties,
>> realize.  Split up sd_init(), and the problem should go away.
>
> Yes, but I don't really want to gate QOMification of mmc
> controller devices on the more complicated problem of
> QOMifying sd.c itself, especially since we already have several
> QOMified mmc controllers...

Is serial.c QOMified?  I don't think so, it's merely structured in a
QOM-friendly way: typedef SerialState, realize helper
serial_realize_core(), unrealize helper serial_exit_core().  If
SerialState had more properties, we'd also need a macro to define them.

I believe sd.c could be made like that, with not much effort.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]