qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 1/2] spapr: Add support for hwrng


From: Sam Bobroff
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 1/2] spapr: Add support for hwrng when available
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:03:16 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:53:26PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/09/15 02:38, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 08:46:01PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> From: Michael Ellerman <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> Some powerpc systems have support for a hardware random number generator
> >> (hwrng). If such a hwrng is present the host kernel can provide access
> >> to it via the H_RANDOM hcall.
> >>
> >> The kernel advertises the presence of a hwrng with the KVM_CAP_PPC_HWRNG
> >> capability. If this is detected we add the appropriate device tree bits
> >> to advertise the presence of the hwrng to the guest kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <address@hidden>
> >> [thuth: Refreshed patch so it applies to QEMU master branch]
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> > 
> > So, I'm confused by one thing.
> > 
> > I thought new kernel handled hcalls were supposed to be disabled by
> > default, but I don't see any calls to kvmppc_enable_hcall() to turn on
> > H_RANDOM.
> 
> Michael's patch was from 2013, the kvmppc_enable_hcall() stuff seems to
> be from 2014 ... so the enablement is likely missing in this patch,
> indeed. I didn't test the in-kernel hypercall yet, just my QEMU
> implementation so far, that's why I did not notice this yet.
> 
> Michael, do you want to rework your patch? Or shall I add an additional
> enablement patch to my queue?

If I recall correctly, it's specifically not enabled: there was quite a lot of
discussion about it when Michael posted the patches and I think the consensus
was that it should only be enabled by QEMU, and only if the user could decide
if it was used or not.

What if we set up another backend that just enables the hcall in KVM?

This would answer the question about what to do if both are available as well:
just do only what the user has asked for. (But I'm not sure what the default
behaviour should be if the user doesn't specify anything.)

(Oh also: I have tested the in-kernel hcall using a QEMU modified to enable it
and it seems to work :-)

Cheers,
Sam.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]