qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] PCI-e device multi-function hot-add support


From: Alex Williamson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] PCI-e device multi-function hot-add support
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:29:39 -0600

On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:12 +0800, Cao jin wrote:
> In case user regret when hot-add multi-function, we should roll back,
> device_del the function added but still not worked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/pci/pcie.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> index 61ebefd..b83a244 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> @@ -265,10 +265,33 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_cb(HotplugHandler 
> *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
>      }
>  }
>  
> +static void pcie_unplug_device(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev, void *opaque)
> +{
> +    object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
> +}
> +
>  void pcie_cap_slot_hot_unplug_request_cb(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
>                                           DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      uint8_t *exp_cap;
> +    PCIDevice *pci_dev = PCI_DEVICE(dev);
> +    PCIBus *bus = pci_dev->bus;
> +
> +    /* handle the condition: user want to hot-add multi function, but regret
> +     * before finish it, and want to delete the added but not worked 
> function.
> +     */
> +    if (PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn) > 0 &&
> +        bus->devices[PCI_DEVFN(0,0)] == NULL) {
> +        pci_for_each_device(bus, pci_bus_num(bus),
> +                            pcie_unplug_device, NULL);
> +
> +        pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> +                                     PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS);
> +        pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> +                                   PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC);
> +
> +        return;
> +    }

How can we know that the guest hasn't discovered the device and made use
of it?  The device is fully accessible to the guest even is the
notification and standard discovery mechanism are not in place.  A
gratuitous full PCI bus scan in the guest could find the device.
Thanks,

Alex

>  
>      pcie_cap_slot_hotplug_common(PCI_DEVICE(hotplug_dev), dev, &exp_cap, 
> errp);
>  
> @@ -382,11 +405,6 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
>      hotplug_event_update_event_status(dev);
>  }
>  
> -static void pcie_unplug_device(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *dev, void *opaque)
> -{
> -    object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
> -}
> -
>  void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev,
>                                  uint32_t addr, uint32_t val, int len)
>  {






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]