Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/10] target-arm: Add VTCR_EL2

[Peter Maydell]

On 11 September 2015 at 15:40, Edgar E. Iglesias
<address@hidden> wrote:
> In the interest avoiding duplication, do you think the following makes
> sense for regs with the el3_aa32ns_aa64any access checks?
>
> 1. Use STATE_BOTH for "low-activity" registers (e.g the EL3 view when EL2 
> does not exist).
> 2. Use STATE_BOTH for regs that anyway have a read/write function
> 3. Split AA64 and AA32 reg entries for regs without read/write helper call 
> for spead (e.g VTCR_EL2).

Sounds plausible.

-- PMM