qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] acpi: arm: add fw_cfg device node to dsd


From: Gabriel L. Somlo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] acpi: arm: add fw_cfg device node to dsdt
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:42:09 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:06:45AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2015/9/14 22:57, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > Add a fw_cfg device node to the ACPI DSDT. This is mostly
> > informational, as the authoritative fw_cfg MMIO region(s)
> > are listed in the Device Tree. However, since we are building
> > ACPI tables, we might as well be thorough while at it...
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index 9088248..dcf9752 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -110,6 +110,18 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_rtc(Aml *scope, const 
> > MemMapEntry *rtc_memmap,
> >      aml_append(scope, dev);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry 
> > *fw_cfg_memmap)
> > +{
> > +    Aml *dev = aml_device("FWCF");
> > +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("QEMU0002")));
> > +
> > +    Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
> > +    aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(fw_cfg_memmap->base,
> > +                                       fw_cfg_memmap->size, 
> > AML_READ_WRITE));
> > +    aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_CRS", crs));
> > +    aml_append(scope, dev);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void acpi_dsdt_add_flash(Aml *scope, const MemMapEntry 
> > *flash_memmap)
> >  {
> >      Aml *dev, *crs;
> > @@ -519,6 +531,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker, 
> > VirtGuestInfo *guest_info)
> >                         (irqmap[VIRT_UART] + ARM_SPI_BASE));
> >      acpi_dsdt_add_rtc(scope, &memmap[VIRT_RTC],
> >                        (irqmap[VIRT_RTC] + ARM_SPI_BASE));
> > +    acpi_dsdt_add_fw_cfg(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG]);
> >      acpi_dsdt_add_flash(scope, &memmap[VIRT_FLASH]);
> >      acpi_dsdt_add_virtio(scope, &memmap[VIRT_MMIO],
> >                      (irqmap[VIRT_MMIO] + ARM_SPI_BASE), 
> > NUM_VIRTIO_TRANSPORTS);
> > 
> 
> This looks fine to me. But from what you said, the kernel driver is not
> in upstream kernel yet, so this would be applied after the kernel patch
> applied in case of unexpected change.

I guess that's ok if you're only talking about the arm side of things
-- although I can't imagine how any of the above would need to change
depending on what happens with the guest-side kernel sysfs driver...
We're talking a node name ("FWCF"), a _HID ("QEMU0002"), and a mmio
region (given to us by memmap[VIRT_FW_CFG]), and that's all there is
to it...

However, on the i386 side, this needs to go in *before* I can continue
working on the guest-side kernel sysfs drivers. One of the
requirements I got was not to probe IOports or MMIO registers blindly,
but rather to use DT on arm and ACPI on i386 to first make sure fw_cfg
is expected to be there, before tickling its registers :)

So I need (at least the i386 part of) this series in qemu before I can
move ahead with the (guest) kernel driver...

Thanks,
--Gabriel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]