qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 16/24] tcg: Move tci_tb_ptr to -common


From: Peter Crosthwaite
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 16/24] tcg: Move tci_tb_ptr to -common
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:04:39 -0700

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 16.09.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Am 16.09.2015 um 14:29 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> From: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>>>>
>>>> This requires global visibility to common code. Move to tcg-common.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>>>> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>  tcg/tcg-common.c | 4 ++++
>>>>  tci.c            | 6 ------
>>>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> The original versions of patches 15 and 16 did not catch
>>> my attention because To / Cc did not include my name.
>>>
>>> Maybe a problem with the git configuration on the sender side?
>>>
>>
>> Sorry. I have fixed that issue (sneaky suppress-cc on my send-email script).
>>
>> Is the patch ok?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>
> It looks fine.
>
> I'd keep the comment which you removed in tci.c and move it to
> the code location where tci_tb_ptr is used. But that can be done
> in a later patch, no need to disturb Paolo's pull request.
>
> With your QEMU multi-arch modification and some smaller additional
> patches it might become possible to build a single QEMU executable
> which supports both interpreted and normal TCG, so the TCG interpreter
> could be available by default. Users would need a command line option
> like --enable-tci to enable it.
>

Yep :) That one is on the multi arch radar but for a later phase. More
a case of multiple backends though rather than target. Can the same
system for differentiating tcg to KVM (accel API) be used here?

Regards,
Peter

> Regards
> Stefan
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]