[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1498144] [NEW] Failure booting hurd with qemu-system-i386 on ARM

[PeteVine]

Public bug reported:

Trying to boot debian-hurd-20150320.img ends with:

qemu-system-i386: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:91: qemu_co_queue_restart_all:
Assertion `qemu_in_coroutine()' failed.

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
__libc_do_syscall ()
    at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S:44
44      ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S: No such file or 
directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  __libc_do_syscall ()
    at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S:44
#1  0xb6ef8f0e in __GI_raise (address@hidden)
    at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
#2  0xb6efb766 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#3  0xb6ef4150 in __assert_fail_base (
    fmt=0x1 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x1>, 
    assertion=0x7f89a234 "qemu_in_coroutine()", address@hidden, 
    file=0x7f89da58 "qemu-coroutine-lock.c", address@hidden "\001", 
    line=91, address@hidden, 
    address@hidden "qemu_co_queue_restart_all")
    at assert.c:92
#4  0xb6ef41e6 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x0, file=0xb5660000 "\001", 
    line=3069931692, function=0x7f89ab78 "qemu_co_queue_restart_all")
    at assert.c:101
#5  0x7f59a6b4 in ?? ()

I was using the same setup as in Bug 893208 (i.e git checkout from
2015-09-15)

** Affects: qemu
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1498144

Title:
   Failure booting hurd with qemu-system-i386 on ARM

Status in QEMU:
  New

Bug description:
  Trying to boot debian-hurd-20150320.img ends with:

  qemu-system-i386: qemu-coroutine-lock.c:91: qemu_co_queue_restart_all:
  Assertion `qemu_in_coroutine()' failed.

  Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
  __libc_do_syscall ()
      at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S:44
  44      ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S: No such file 
or directory.
  (gdb) bt
  #0  __libc_do_syscall ()
      at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/libc-do-syscall.S:44
  #1  0xb6ef8f0e in __GI_raise (address@hidden)
      at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
  #2  0xb6efb766 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
  #3  0xb6ef4150 in __assert_fail_base (
      fmt=0x1 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x1>, 
      assertion=0x7f89a234 "qemu_in_coroutine()", address@hidden, 
      file=0x7f89da58 "qemu-coroutine-lock.c", address@hidden "\001", 
      line=91, address@hidden, 
      address@hidden "qemu_co_queue_restart_all")
      at assert.c:92
  #4  0xb6ef41e6 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x0, file=0xb5660000 "\001", 
      line=3069931692, function=0x7f89ab78 "qemu_co_queue_restart_all")
      at assert.c:101
  #5  0x7f59a6b4 in ?? ()

  I was using the same setup as in Bug 893208 (i.e git checkout from
  2015-09-15)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1498144/+subscriptions