Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] add ACPI node for fw_cfg on pc and arm

[Gabriel L. Somlo]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:56:29 -0400
> "Gabriel L. Somlo" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > New since v2:
> > 
> >     - pc/i386 node in ssdt only on machine types *newer* than 2.4
> >       (as suggested by Eduardo)
> > 
> > I appreciate any further comments and reviews. Hopefully we can make
> > this palatable for upstream, modulo the lingering concerns about whether
> > "QEMU0002" is ok to use as the value of _HID, which I'll hopefully get
> > sorted out with the kernel crew...
> > 
> > Thanks much,
> >   --Gabriel
> > 
> > >New since v1:
> > >
> > >   - expose control register size (suggested by Marc Marí)
> > >
> > >   - leaving out _UID and _STA fields (thanks Shannon & Igor)
> > >
> > >   - using "QEMU0002" as the value of _HID (thanks Michael)
> > >
> > >   - added documentation blurb to docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt
> > >     (mainly to record usage of the "QEMU0002" string with fw_cfg).
> > >
> > >> This series adds a fw_cfg device node to the SSDT (on pc), or to the
> > >> DSDT (on arm).
> > >>
> > >>  - Patch 1/3 moves (and renames) the BIOS_CFG_IOPORT (0x510)
> > >>    define from pc.c to pc.h, so that it could be used from
> > >>    acpi-build.c in patch 2/3.
> > >> 
> 
> > >>  - Patch 2/3 adds a fw_cfg node to the pc SSDT.
> > >> 
> > >>  - Patch 3/3 adds a fw_cfg node to the arm DSDT.
> ACPI patches 2-3 look fine to me
> although there is one but, it will make Windows complain about
> unknown device and prompt user to install driver.

I wonder if the implicit _STA has bit 2 (visible to u/i) implicitly
enabled (0x0F vs. 0x0B)... I'll try to reproduce this myself, and see
if adding (back) the explicit _STA value helps.

Thanks!
--Gabriel

> 
> > >>
> > >> I made up some names - "FWCF" for the node name, and "FWCF0001"
> > >> for _HID; no idea whether that's appropriate, or how else I should
> > >> figure out what to use instead...
> > >>
> > >> Also, using scope "\\_SB", based on where fw_cfg shows up in the
> > >> output of "info qtree". Again, if that's wrong, please point me in
> > >> the right direction.
> > >>
> > >> Re. 3/3 (also mentioned after the commit blurb in the patch itself),
> > >> I noticed none of the other DSDT entries contain a _STA field, wondering
> > >> why it would (not) make sense to include that, same as on the PC.
> > 
> > Gabriel L. Somlo (5):
> >   fw_cfg: expose control register size in fw_cfg.h
> >   pc: fw_cfg: move ioport base constant to pc.h
> >   acpi: pc: add fw_cfg device node to ssdt
> >   acpi: arm: add fw_cfg device node to dsdt
> >   fw_cfg: document ACPI device node information
> > 
> >  docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt     |  9 +++++++++
> >  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c  | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c      | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  hw/i386/pc.c              |  5 ++---
> >  hw/i386/pc_piix.c         |  1 +
> >  hw/i386/pc_q35.c          |  1 +
> >  hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c         |  8 +++++---
> >  include/hw/i386/pc.h      |  3 +++
> >  include/hw/nvram/fw_cfg.h |  3 +++
> >  9 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
>