qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/48] ivshmem series


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/48] ivshmem series
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:44:13 -0400 (EDT)

Hi

----- Original Message -----
> Am 07.10.2015 um 14:16 schrieb Marc-André Lureau:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> Am 06.10.2015 um 21:18 schrieb address@hidden:
> >>> Marc-André Lureau (45):
> >> [...]
> >>>       tests: add ivshmem qtest
> >>
> >> I had NAK'ed this patch in v1 and it has not been fixed. If this pull
> >> gets merged I will immediately revert it. Not funny.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > Could stick to technical review, please. The test runs fine without kvm.
> > Regarding your copyright claim, I already explain that your older version
> > of boilerplate test is really nothing compare to this one. But if you feel
> > so strongly about it, I don't care you add a copyright line.
> 
> It is non-technical and called plagiarism.

All tests share common boilerplate. Your test is not even in my tests. You 
could add it back!

> This is not about adding a copyright line to the file, it's about having
> a Signed-off-by on your patch. I had the same discussion with Paolo
> before, when he supposedly saw-but-not-read my patch. The common
> denominator is that every time this happens to me it's address@hidden

they are everywhere :)

> You were arguing that because your patch does more than mine you don't
> need to carry my copyright and Sob - that's an invalid argument given
> that even trivial refactoring changes by copyright holder IBM have been
> blocking our relicensing efforts. We chose not to define a threshold.
 
I propose to add your patch first, that way you get your test and your 
copyright. Would that work for you?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]