qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-tilegx: Let prefetch nop instructions re


From: Chen Gang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-tilegx: Let prefetch nop instructions return before allocating dest temporary register
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:12:36 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0

Hello all:

It looks I have to spend quite a few free time resources on tilegx gcc
testsuite issues, next (may 2-3 months at least, I guess).

So for tilegx qemu, I guess, I need to start to implement the floating
point, at present. I shall try to finish within this month (although it
seems not quite easy to me).

By the way, excuse me, my English is not quite well, so:

 - I have to try to 'speak' as clearly as I can, so sometimes what I
   said may be not quite polite, please understand.

 - If any members find any issues/bugs which may be related with me,
   please say directly and clearly (or sometimes, I maybe misunderstand,
   then waste our time resources).


Thanks.

On 10/10/15 06:50, Chen Gang wrote:
> 
> On 10/10/15 06:10, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/09/2015 09:48 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 10/7/15 18:17, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> On 10/7/15 17:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On 10/04/2015 10:15 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>>>>  From 40ec3f1c75b4c97e3e0495c9e465be898f48a652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>>> From: Chen Gang<address@hidden>
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 17:34:17 +0800
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] target-tilegx: Let prefetch nop instructions return 
>>>>>> before allocating dest temporary register
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or it will cause issue by the dest temporary registers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang<address@hidden>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> target-tilegx/translate.c | 85 
>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't my patch 14/14 from the last patch set sufficient?
>>>>>
>>>
>>> At present, all patches (include 14/14) are integrated into master tree,
>>> so I guess, we have to integrate this patch into master tree next, it
>>> fix the dest temporary registers' issue.
>>
>> What issue?  The prefetch instructions "load" to the zero register,
>> which is never written back to the register file.
>>
> 
> OK, really. But for me, the code is very easy to lead other members to
> make mistakes.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

-- 
Chen Gang (陈刚)

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]