Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [RFC] transactions: add transaction-wide property

[John Snow]

On 10/19/2015 03:27 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 10/16/2015 08:23 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:50:20PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>>> Ping -- any consensus on how we should implement the "do-or-die"
>>>> argument for transactions that start block jobs? :)
>>>>
>>>> This patch may look a little hokey in how it boxes arguments, but I can
>>>> re-do it on top of Eric Blake's very official way of boxing arguments,
>>>> when the QAPI dust settles.
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you are trying to do after staring at the email
>>> for 5 minutes.  Maybe the other reviewers hit the same problem and
>>> haven't responded.
>>>
>>> What is the problem you're trying to solve?
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>
>> Sorry...
>>
>> What I am trying to do is to add the transactional blocker property to
>> the *transaction* command and not as an argument to each individual action.
>>
>> There was some discussion on this so I wanted to just send an RFC to
>> show what I had in mind.
> 
> Was it the discussion on @transactional-cancel?  I'm on record
> supporting it per transaction rather than per action:
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg05948.html
> 

Yes, this is the patch trying to illustrate that. I wrote it as an RFC
that sits on top of Fam's v7, to highlight the changes between his and
my approaches.

>> This series applies on top of Fam's latest series and moves the
>> arguments from each action to a transaction-wide property.