qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] configure claims I requested feature nettle when I didn


From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] configure claims I requested feature nettle when I didn't...
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:11:38 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:09:14PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 October 2015 at 16:43, Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Yes, if configure finds  gnutls, it tries to figure out if gnutls
> > links to nettle or gcrypt, and then checks for the corresponding
> > one. It fails if gnutls is found, but the corresponding nettle/gcrypt
> > is not found, on the basis that that should not actually happen, as
> > installing gnutls-dev should pull in nettle-dev/gcrypt-dev packages
> > as appropriate.
> 
> This doesn't appear to be true in practice:
> 
> address@hidden all]$ yum list gnutls-devel
> Installed Packages
> gnutls-devel.ppc64                    3.1.26-2.fc20                     
> @updates
> Available Packages
> gnutls-devel.ppc                      3.1.26-2.fc20                     
> updates
> address@hidden all]$ yum list libgcrypt-devel
> Available Packages
> libgcrypt-devel.ppc                      1.5.3-2.fc20                     
> fedora
> libgcrypt-devel.ppc64                    1.5.3-2.fc20                     
> fedora
> address@hidden all]$ yum list nettle-devel
> Available Packages
> nettle-devel.ppc                       2.7.1-3.fc20                      
> updates
> nettle-devel.ppc64                     2.7.1-3.fc20                      
> updates
> 
> (This is gcc110 in the FSF compile farm, if you happen to have
> a compile farm account.)
> 
> > Did you only see this with todays master ?  This particular hard failure
> > logic was present even before commit 
> > 4e2abbeacce6e12e62a0183c67936c807b19c3b9
> > so I would expect you to see it all the way back to
> > ed754746fea55df726f4de3dadb5bea0b6aa7409
> 
> The machine in question (a ppc64be system running Fedora 20) has
> had a fresh OS install and a bunch of dev packages installed
> today, which is why I noticed it. I suspect it previously did
> not have any of the gnutls dev packages.

Ok, I will fix this, as part of the pull request I already have pending
and send a new pull request.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]