qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] cmdide0:1:0: lost interrupt on NetBSD 7


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cmdide0:1:0: lost interrupt on NetBSD 7
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:45:32 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0


On 11/07/2015 08:29 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> Whilst testing various images under qemu-system-sparc64, I've noticed a
> regression with the new NetBSD 7 release. On boot the kernel hangs just
> after detecting the CDROM and eventually outputs "cmdide0:1:0: lost
> interrupt" onto the console.
> 
> A quick session with git bisect points to the following patch:
> 
> 9ef2e93f9b1888c7d0deb4a105149138e6ad2e98 is the first bad commit
> commit 9ef2e93f9b1888c7d0deb4a105149138e6ad2e98
> Author: John Snow <address@hidden>
> Date:   Thu Sep 17 14:17:05 2015 -0400
> 
>     atapi: abort transfers with 0 byte limits
> 
>     We're supposed to abort on transfers like this, unless we fill
>     Word 125 of our IDENTIFY data with a default transfer size, which
>     we don't currently do.
> 
>     This is an ATA error, not a SCSI/ATAPI one.
>     See ATA8-ACS3 sections 7.17.6.49 or 7.21.5.
> 
>     If we don't do this, QEMU will loop forever trying to transfer
>     zero bytes, which isn't particularly useful.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: John Snow <address@hidden>
>     Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>     Message-id: address@hidden
> 
> Reproducing the bug is easy enough using the command line below:
> 
> ./qemu-system-sparc64 -cdrom NetBSD-7.0-sparc64.iso -boot d -nographic
> 
> Testing also shows that NetBSD 6 is apparently unaffected by this change.
> 
> 
> ATB,
> 
> Mark.
> 

Well, that's interesting ... The condition this patch was added to
protect was PIO transfers with 0 byte transfer limits, which caused an
infinite loop before. (It shouldn't have ever worked!)

That I actually managed to break a guest with this is a little shocking.

I'll debug, thanks.

--js



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]