qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Add/Re-introduce MMU model definitions nee


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ppc: Add/Re-introduce MMU model definitions needed by PR KVM
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:13:50 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 11/07/2015 08:12 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 13:12 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
Commit aa4bb5875231 (ppc: Add mmu_model defines for arch 2.03 and
2.07)
removed the mmu_model definition POWERPC_MMU_2_06a which is needed by
PR KVM. Reintroduce it and also add POWERPC_MMU_2_07a.

This fixes QEMU crash (qemu: fatal: Unknown MMU model) during booting
of PR KVM guest.

Hrm, I see... we clear the 1TSEG bit and that causes the switch/cases
to no long work. Argh....

We should clean up that junk. We are mixing up bit masks and an actual
model "number" in the same field. We should make that cleaner, using
a mask to extract the actual version and switch/case on *that*...


I like this and I wonder if Bharata is going to do this, if not, I will, I just noticed this this patch made it to the dwg/spapr-next tree so we need to hurry...

Bharata, got some time for this? Thanks.




Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
---
  target-ppc/cpu.h        | 6 ++++++
  target-ppc/mmu_helper.c | 8 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h
index b34aed6..31c6fee 100644
--- a/target-ppc/cpu.h
+++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h
@@ -122,9 +122,15 @@ enum powerpc_mmu_t {
      /* Architecture 2.06 variant                               */
      POWERPC_MMU_2_06       = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG
                               | POWERPC_MMU_AMR | 0x00000003,
+    /* Architecture 2.06 "degraded" (no 1T segments)           */
+    POWERPC_MMU_2_06a      = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_AMR
+                             | 0x00000003,
      /* Architecture 2.07 variant                               */
      POWERPC_MMU_2_07       = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_1TSEG
                               | POWERPC_MMU_AMR | 0x00000004,
+    /* Architecture 2.07 "degraded" (no 1T segments)           */
+    POWERPC_MMU_2_07a      = POWERPC_MMU_64 | POWERPC_MMU_AMR
+                             | 0x00000004,
  #endif /* defined(TARGET_PPC64) */
  };

diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c
index e52d0e5..30298d8 100644
--- a/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c
+++ b/target-ppc/mmu_helper.c
@@ -1295,7 +1295,9 @@ void dump_mmu(FILE *f, fprintf_function
cpu_fprintf, CPUPPCState *env)
      case POWERPC_MMU_64B:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_03:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_06:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_06a:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_07:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_07a:
          dump_slb(f, cpu_fprintf, env);
          break;
  #endif
@@ -1435,7 +1437,9 @@ hwaddr ppc_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState
*cs, vaddr addr)
      case POWERPC_MMU_64B:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_03:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_06:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_06a:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_07:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_07a:
          return ppc_hash64_get_phys_page_debug(env, addr);
  #endif

@@ -1939,7 +1943,9 @@ void ppc_tlb_invalidate_all(CPUPPCState *env)
      case POWERPC_MMU_64B:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_03:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_06:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_06a:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_07:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_07a:
  #endif /* defined(TARGET_PPC64) */
          tlb_flush(CPU(cpu), 1);
          break;
@@ -2013,7 +2019,9 @@ void ppc_tlb_invalidate_one(CPUPPCState *env,
target_ulong addr)
      case POWERPC_MMU_64B:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_03:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_06:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_06a:
      case POWERPC_MMU_2_07:
+    case POWERPC_MMU_2_07a:
          /* tlbie invalidate TLBs for all segments */
          /* XXX: given the fact that there are too many segments to
invalidate,
           *      and we still don't have a tlb_flush_mask(env, n,
mask) in QEMU,


--
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]