|
From: | Marcel Apfelbaum |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/4] hw/pcie: Multi-root support for Q35 |
Date: | Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:34:11 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 |
On 11/16/2015 12:11 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 16/11/2015 11:10, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:What would you lose? Hotplug?Without the bridge? Yes. However the user can add it manually the pci-bridge and have it anyway.Ok, I guess that's more or less acceptable. It's still ugly however, to the point that I wonder if we should rename the device and call the old one a failed experiment.
I guess we can rename the pxb to extra-root or something, but in this way will have a deprecated/duplicated device to support and kill in the future. Why not use the compat property as it is? Again, the command line *remains* the same, the difference is where the devices associated with the pxb will land: on the secondary bus (for QEMU < 2.5) or on the root bus itself (QEMU >= 2.5). I know is guest visible, but the guest will see one of them depending on the machine type. Regarding the splitting of pxb into 2 devices (pci/pcie), I have nothing against it, but because the implementation is *exactly* the same I think we should gain more by maintaining one device. Thanks, Marcel
PaoloI wanted to get rid of the internal pci-bridge as a default, and this is why pxb and pxb-pcie are he same device now (except bus type)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |