qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] devicetree: update documentation for fw_


From: Gabriel L. Somlo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 4/4] devicetree: update documentation for fw_cfg ARM bindings
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:47:39 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:35:51PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/23/15 16:57, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > From: Gabriel Somlo <address@hidden>
> > 
> > Remove fw_cfg hardware interface details from
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt,
> > and replace them with a pointer to the authoritative
> > documentation in the QEMU source tree.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Somlo <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt | 38 
> > ++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt 
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt
> > index 953fb64..ce27386 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt
> > @@ -11,43 +11,9 @@ QEMU exposes the control and data register to ARM guests 
> > as memory mapped
> >  registers; their location is communicated to the guest's UEFI firmware in 
> > the
> >  DTB that QEMU places at the bottom of the guest's DRAM.
> >  
> > -The guest writes a selector value (a key) to the selector register, and 
> > then
> > -can read the corresponding data (produced by QEMU) via the data register. 
> > If
> > -the selected entry is writable, the guest can rewrite it through the data
> > -register.
> > +The authoritative guest-side hardware interface documentation to the fw_cfg
> > +device ca be found in "docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt" in the QEMU source tree.
> 
> ca[n] be found

Same typo occurred in Patch 1/4 as well (both doc files refer to the
QEMU fw_cfg spec), so I pre-emptively fixed it there as well.

Thanks!
--Gabriel

> 
> >  
> > -The selector register takes keys in big endian byte order.
> > -
> > -The data register allows accesses with 8, 16, 32 and 64-bit width (only at
> > -offset 0 of the register). Accesses larger than a byte are interpreted as
> > -arrays, bundled together only for better performance. The bytes 
> > constituting
> > -such a word, in increasing address order, correspond to the bytes that 
> > would
> > -have been transferred by byte-wide accesses in chronological order.
> > -
> > -The interface allows guest firmware to download various parameters and 
> > blobs
> > -that affect how the firmware works and what tables it installs for the 
> > guest
> > -OS. For example, boot order of devices, ACPI tables, SMBIOS tables, kernel 
> > and
> > -initrd images for direct kernel booting, virtual machine UUID, SMP 
> > information,
> > -virtual NUMA topology, and so on.
> > -
> > -The authoritative registry of the valid selector values and their meanings 
> > is
> > -the QEMU source code; the structure of the data blobs corresponding to the
> > -individual key values is also defined in the QEMU source code.
> > -
> > -The presence of the registers can be verified by selecting the "signature" 
> > blob
> > -with key 0x0000, and reading four bytes from the data register. The 
> > returned
> > -signature is "QEMU".
> > -
> > -The outermost protocol (involving the write / read sequences of the 
> > control and
> > -data registers) is expected to be versioned, and/or described by feature 
> > bits.
> > -The interface revision / feature bitmap can be retrieved with key 0x0001. 
> > The
> > -blob to be read from the data register has size 4, and it is to be 
> > interpreted
> > -as a uint32_t value in little endian byte order. The current value
> > -(corresponding to the above outer protocol) is zero.
> > -
> > -The guest kernel is not expected to use these registers (although it is
> > -certainly allowed to); the device tree bindings are documented here because
> > -this is where device tree bindings reside in general.
> >  
> >  Required properties:
> >  
> > 
> 
> As long as Peter is fine with this, I don't object.
> 
> With the typo fixed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]