qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 7/9] net/colo-proxy: add packet enqueue and


From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 7/9] net/colo-proxy: add packet enqueue and handle function
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:09:38 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

* Zhang Chen (address@hidden) wrote:
> 
> Hi,Dave
> 
> On 12/02/2015 12:12 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >* Zhang Chen (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>From: zhangchen <address@hidden>
> >>
> >>Add common packet handle function and enqueue
> >>packet distinguished connection,then we can
> >>lookup one connection packet to compare
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: zhangchen <address@hidden>
> >>---
> >>  net/colo-proxy.c | 167 
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 166 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/net/colo-proxy.c b/net/colo-proxy.c
> >>index 08a852f..a664e6d 100644
> >>--- a/net/colo-proxy.c
> >>+++ b/net/colo-proxy.c
> >>@@ -24,6 +24,170 @@
> >>  static char *mode;
> >>  static bool colo_do_checkpoint;
> >>+static void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data);
> >>+
> >>+static uint32_t connection_key_hash(const void *opaque)
> >>+{
> >>+    const Connection_key *key = opaque;
> >>+    uint32_t a, b, c;
> >>+
> >>+    /* Jenkins hash */
> >>+    a = b = c = JHASH_INITVAL + sizeof(*key);
> >>+    a += key->src;
> >>+    b += key->dst;
> >>+    c += key->ports;
> >>+    __jhash_mix(a, b, c);
> >>+
> >>+    a += key->ip_proto;
> >>+    __jhash_final(a, b, c);
> >>+
> >>+    return c;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static int connection_key_equal(const void *opaque1, const void *opaque2)
> >>+{
> >>+    return memcmp(opaque1, opaque2, sizeof(Connection_key)) == 0;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void connection_destroy(void *opaque)
> >>+{
> >>+    Connection *connection = opaque;
> >>+    g_queue_foreach(&connection->primary_list, packet_destroy, NULL);
> >>+    g_queue_free(&connection->primary_list);
> >>+    g_queue_foreach(&connection->secondary_list, packet_destroy, NULL);
> >>+    g_queue_free(&connection->secondary_list);
> >>+    g_slice_free(Connection, connection);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static Connection *connection_new(void)
> >>+{
> >>+    Connection *connection = g_slice_new(Connection);
> >>+
> >>+    g_queue_init(&connection->primary_list);
> >>+    g_queue_init(&connection->secondary_list);
> >>+    connection->processing = false;
> >>+
> >>+    return connection;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+/* Return 0 on success, or return -1 if the pkt is corrpted */
> >>+static int parse_packet_early(Packet *pkt, Connection_key *key)
> >>+{
> >>+    int network_length;
> >>+    uint8_t *data = pkt->data;
> >>+
> >>+    pkt->network_layer = data + ETH_HLEN;
> >>+    if (ntohs(*(uint16_t *)(data + 12)) != ETH_P_IP) {
> >>+        if (ntohs(*(uint16_t *)(data + 12)) == ETH_P_ARP) {
> >>+            return -1;
> >>+        }
> >>+        return 0;
> >>+    }
> >Can you use some of the functions/macros in include/net/eth.h to
> >make this easier? Maybe eth_get_l3_proto ?
> >Do you plan to do IPv6 at some point?
> 
> I will use include/net/eth.h in next version
> 
> IPv6 currently not support, still colo framework be merged
> 
> >>+    network_length = pkt->ip->ip_hl * 4;
> >>+    pkt->transport_layer = pkt->network_layer + network_length;
> >>+    key->ip_proto = pkt->ip->ip_p;
> >>+    key->src = pkt->ip->ip_src;
> >>+    key->dst = pkt->ip->ip_dst;
> >>+
> >>+    switch (key->ip_proto) {
> >>+    case IPPROTO_TCP:
> >>+    case IPPROTO_UDP:
> >>+    case IPPROTO_DCCP:
> >>+    case IPPROTO_ESP:
> >>+    case IPPROTO_SCTP:
> >>+    case IPPROTO_UDPLITE:
> >>+        key->ports = *(uint32_t *)(pkt->transport_layer);
> >>+        break;
> >>+    case IPPROTO_AH:
> >>+        key->ports = *(uint32_t *)(pkt->transport_layer + 4);
> >Interesting; I don't see any other code in QEMU to handle AH,
> >and I don't know much about it.
> >
> >>+        break;
> >>+    default:
> >>+        break;
> >>+    }
> >>+
> >>+    return 0;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static Packet *packet_new(ColoProxyState *s, const void *data,
> >>+                          int size, Connection_key *key, NetClientState 
> >>*sender)
> >>+{
> >>+    Packet *pkt = g_slice_new(Packet);
> >>+
> >>+    pkt->data = g_malloc(size);
> >>+    memcpy(pkt->data, data, size);
> >g_memdup might be useful for these:
> >https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Memory-Allocation.html#g-memdup
> 
> I will fix it in next version
> 
> >>+    pkt->size = size;
> >>+    pkt->s = s;
> >>+    pkt->sender = sender;
> >>+    pkt->should_be_sent = false;
> >>+
> >>+    if (parse_packet_early(pkt, key)) {
> >>+        packet_destroy(pkt, NULL);
> >>+        pkt = NULL;
> >>+    }
> >>+
> >>+    return pkt;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void packet_destroy(void *opaque, void *user_data)
> >>+{
> >>+    Packet *pkt = opaque;
> >>+    g_free(pkt->data);
> >>+    g_slice_free(Packet, pkt);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static Connection *colo_proxy_enqueue_packet(GHashTable 
> >>*unprocessed_packets,
> >>+                                          Connection_key *key,
> >>+                                          Packet *pkt, packet_type type)
> >>+{
> >>+    Connection *connection;
> >>+    Packet *tmppkt;
> >>+    connection = g_hash_table_lookup(unprocessed_packets, key);
> >>+    if (connection == NULL) {
> >>+        Connection_key *new_key = g_malloc(sizeof(*key));
> >>+
> >>+        connection = connection_new();
> >>+        memcpy(new_key, key, sizeof(*key));
> >>+        key = new_key;
> >>+
> >>+        g_hash_table_insert(unprocessed_packets, key, connection);
> >Is 'unprocessed_packets' a good name for this hashtable? I'm not quite
> >sure I understand, but it looks to me like it's your connection-tracking 
> >equivalent,
> >which then has a queue for each connection with unprocessed packets?
> 
> i will change hashtable name to connection_track_table,is it ok?

Yes, thank you.

> >Also, do we do anything to stop this hash growing really huge? If there
> >are lots-and-lots of connections can we limit it somehow? (what does Linux 
> >do?)
> 
> when we find PVM's packet different to SVM's packet,colo will do checkpoint.
> that's means we will flush all connection's packets,even though all packets
> are
> same,colo will alse do checkpoint periodically. so hashtable can't growing
> really huge.

I see the flush clears all the packets, but does it also clear the hash?

> >>+    }
> >>+    switch (type) {
> >>+    case PRIMARY_OUTPUT:
> >>+        if (g_queue_get_length(&connection->secondary_list) > 0) {
> >Please add some more comments; I think this is when a packet comes in
> >on the primary, and then we find we've already got a packet from the 
> >secondary
> >waiting?
> 
> yes,you are right
> 
> I will add more comments in next version

Thank you.

Dave

> >>+            tmppkt = g_queue_pop_head(&connection->secondary_list);
> >>+            DEBUG("g_queue_get_length(&connection->primary_list)=%d\n",
> >>+                        g_queue_get_length(&connection->primary_list));
> >>+            DEBUG("g_queue_get_length(&connection->secondary_list)=%d\n",
> >>+                        g_queue_get_length(&connection->secondary_list));
> >>+            if (colo_packet_compare(pkt, tmppkt)) {
> >>+                DEBUG("packet same and release packet\n");
> >>+                pkt->should_be_sent = true;
> >>+                break;
> >>+            } else {
> >>+                DEBUG("packet different\n");
> >>+                colo_proxy_notify_checkpoint();
> >>+                pkt->should_be_sent = false;
> >>+                break;
> >>+            }
> >>+        } else {
> >>+            g_queue_push_tail(&connection->primary_list, pkt);
> >>+            pkt->should_be_sent = false;
> >>+        }
> >>+
> >>+        break;
> >>+    case SECONDARY_OUTPUT:
> >>+        g_queue_push_tail(&connection->secondary_list, pkt);
> >>+        DEBUG("secondary pkt data=%s,  
> >>pkt->ip->ipsrc=%x,pkt->ip->ipdst=%x\n",
> >>+                    (char *)pkt->data, pkt->ip->ip_src, pkt->ip->ip_dst);
> >>+        break;
> >>+    default:
> >>+        abort();
> >>+    }
> >>+
> >>+    return connection;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>  /*
> >>   * Packets to be sent by colo forward to
> >>@@ -165,7 +329,8 @@ static ssize_t 
> >>colo_proxy_primary_handler(NetFilterState *nf,
> >>      }
> >>      if (direction == NET_FILTER_DIRECTION_RX) {
> >>-        /* TODO: enqueue_primary_packet */
> >>+        ret = colo_enqueue_primary_packet(nf, sender, flags, iov,
> >>+                    iovcnt, sent_cb);
> >The routine above is 'colo_enqueue_packet' rather than 
> >colo_enqueue_primary_packet?
> 
> yes,colo_enqueue_packet is enqueue packet common
> 
> Thanks for review
> zhangchen
> 
> >>      } else {
> >>          ret = colo_forward2another(nf, sender, flags, iov, iovcnt,
> >>                      sent_cb, COLO_PRIMARY_MODE);
> >>-- 
> >>1.9.1
> >Dave
> >
> >>
> >>
> >--
> >Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> 
> 
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]