qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] hw/sd: QOMify sd.c (and pxa2xx_mmci)


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] hw/sd: QOMify sd.c (and pxa2xx_mmci)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:25:05 -0800

+Sai Pavan

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> This series attempts to QOMify sd.c (the actual SD card model),
> including a proper QOM bus between the controller and the card.
>
> This series removes the experimental x-drive property on sdhci-pci;
> the syntax for using that device changes:
>
> instead of using the x-drive property:
>
>   -device sdhci-pci,x-drive=mydrive -drive id=mydrive,[...]
>
> we create a specific sd device (which is autoplugged into the
> sdhci-pci device's "sd-bus" bus if you don't manually connect them):
>
>   -device sdhci-pci -drive id=mydrive,[...] -device sd,drive=mydrive
>
>
> The basic structure of the patch series is:
>  * QOMify sd.c itself
>  * Add the QOM bus APIs
>  * Convert sdhci to use the QOM bus APIs
>  * QOMify pxa2xx_mmci
>  * Convert pxa2xx_mmci to use the QOM bus APIs
>
>
> Points worthy of review:
>  * is the code in "sdhci_sysbus: Create SD card device in users"
>    for xlnx-ep108.c to connect the SD cards up to the two controllers
>    inside the SoC doing this in the right way?
>  * I chose not to try to make the SD card type a subclass of
>    SSI, because the interface we have at the moment didn't really
>    seem to line up with what SSI has
>  * generally do I have the QOM style right?
>
>
> Some notes on compatibility/bisection:
>  * the old-style non-QOMified controllers (which get their drive
>    via blk_by_legacy_dinfo() continue to work through the whole series
>  * the only QOMified controller which doesn't do that is sdhci-pci,
>    which uses the experimental x-drive property to take a drive. This
>    support and property is removed in patch 1; support for the new
>    syntax is added in patch 5.
>    (Since we're breaking the old syntax anyway I chose to not try to
>    introduce the new syntax in the same commit as breaking the old one;
>    I think it makes the patches easier to review.)
>
>
> I don't have any Xilinx test images, so I haven't been able to test
> the changes to those boards (beyond confirming that the board doesn't
> crash on startup and that 'info qtree' seems to show SD cards
> connected to the right things). I have tested sdhci-pci and
> the pxa2xx.
>
> Peter Maydell (10):
>   hw/sd/sdhci.c: Remove x-drive property
>   hw/sd/sd.c: QOMify
>   hw/sd/sd.c: Convert sd_reset() function into Device reset method
>   hw/sd: Add QOM bus which SD cards plug in to
>   hw/sd/sdhci.c: Update to use SDBus APIs
>   sdhci_sysbus: Create SD card device in users, not the device itself
>   hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: convert to SysBusDevice object
>   hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: Update to use new SDBus APIs
>   hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: Convert to VMStateDescription
>   hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci: Add reset function
>
>  hw/arm/xilinx_zynq.c  |  17 ++-
>  hw/arm/xlnx-ep108.c   |  19 ++++
>  hw/sd/Makefile.objs   |   2 +-
>  hw/sd/core.c          | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/sd/pxa2xx_mmci.c   | 304 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  hw/sd/sd.c            | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  hw/sd/sdhci.c         |  83 ++++++++------
>  include/hw/sd/sd.h    |  63 +++++++++++
>  include/hw/sd/sdhci.h |   3 +-
>  9 files changed, 610 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 hw/sd/core.c
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]