qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 54/74] pc: acpi: move remaining GPE handlers int


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 54/74] pc: acpi: move remaining GPE handlers into SSDT
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:37:40 +0200

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 04:35:23PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2015 22:34:55 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:41:48AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c      | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  hw/i386/acpi-dsdt.dsl     | 40 ----------------------------------------
> > >  hw/i386/q35-acpi-dsdt.dsl | 36 ------------------------------------
> > >  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > index 581ad98..99c0294 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -1400,8 +1400,25 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> > >      build_memory_hotplug_aml(ssdt, nr_mem, pm->mem_hp_io_base,
> > >                               pm->mem_hp_io_len);
> > >  
> > > -    scope =  aml_scope("\\_GPE");
> > > +    scope =  aml_scope("_GPE");
> > >      {
> > > +        aml_append(scope, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0006")));
> > > +
> > > +        method = aml_method("_L00", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > > +        aml_append(scope, method);
> > > +
> > > +        if (misc->is_piix4) {
> > > +            method = aml_method("_E01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > > +            aml_append(method,
> > > +                aml_acquire(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK"), 0xFFFF));
> > > +            aml_append(method, aml_call0("\\_SB.PCI0.PCNT"));
> > > +            aml_append(method, aml_release(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK")));
> > > +            aml_append(scope, method);
> > > +        } else {
> > > +            method = aml_method("_L01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > > +            aml_append(scope, method);
> > > +        }
> > > +
> > >          method = aml_method("_E02", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > >          aml_append(method, aml_call0("\\_SB." CPU_SCAN_METHOD));
> > >          aml_append(scope, method);
> > > @@ -1409,6 +1426,13 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> > >          method = aml_method("_E03", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > >          aml_append(method, aml_call0(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH));
> > >          aml_append(scope, method);
> > > +
> > > +        for (i = 4; i <= 0xF; i++) {
> > > +            char *name = g_strdup_printf("_L0%X", i);
> > > +            method = aml_method(name, 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > > +            aml_append(scope, method);
> > > +            g_free(name);
> > > +        }
> > 
> > How about we make aml_method accept ... format instead?
> actually instead of making aml_method(format,...) it would be
> easier to make it accept Aml* so we could reuse aml_name(format,...)
> in the end it would look like:
> 
>  Aml gpe_name = aml_name("_L0%X", i);
>  aml_method(gpe_name, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> 
> in addition name object could be reused in other places
> that reference that method.

Except most methods are simple, so maybe do both APIs.
Avoiding string duplication is a good idea,
but using string constants works just as well.

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]