|
From: | Hailiang Zhang |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: not send zero page header in ram bulk stage |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:25:09 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 |
On 2016/1/19 11:11, Hailiang Zhang wrote:
On 2016/1/19 9:26, Li, Liang Z wrote:On 2016/1/15 18:24, Li, Liang Z wrote:It seems that this patch is incorrect, if the no-zero pages are zeroed again during !ram_bulk_stage, we didn't send the new zeroed page, there will be an error.If not in ram_bulk_stage, still send the header, could you explain why it'swrong?LiangI have made a mistake, and yes, this patch can speed up the live migration time, especially when there are many zero pages, it will be more obvious. I like this idea. Did you test it with postcopy ? Does it break postcopy ?Not yet, I saw Dave's comment's, it will beak post copy, it's not hard to fix this. A more important thing is Paolo's comments, I don't know in which case this patch will break LM. Do you have any idea about this? Hope that QEMU don't write data to the block 'pc.ram'.Paolo is right, for VM in destination, QEMU may write VM's memory before VM starts. So your assumption that "VM's RAM pages are initialized to zero" is incorrect. This patch will break LM.
Actually, someone has done like that before and cause a migration bug, See commit f1c72795af573b24a7da5eb52375c9aba8a37972, and the fixing patch is commit 9ef051e5536b6368a1076046ec6c4ec4ac12b5c6 Revert "migration: do not sent zero pages in bulk stage"
LiangThanks, zhanghailiang.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |