qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] spapr: Remove rtas_st_buffer_direct()


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] spapr: Remove rtas_st_buffer_direct()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:08:51 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:07:23PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 01/16/2016 12:14 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >rtas_st_buffer_direct() is a not particularly useful wrapper around
> >cpu_physical_memory_write().  All the callers are in
> >rtas_ibm_configure_connector, where it's better handled by local helper.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> >---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c    | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> >  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |  8 --------
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> >index f4fb9ba..940509e 100644
> >--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> >+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> >@@ -504,6 +504,13 @@ out:
> >  #define CC_VAL_DATA_OFFSET ((CC_IDX_PROP_DATA_OFFSET + 1) * 4)
> >  #define CC_WA_LEN 4096
> >
> >+static void st_cc_buf(target_ulong addr, target_ulong offset,
> >+                      void *buf, size_t len)
> 
> 
> Can we please call it cc_st_buf() to make it clear that "cc" is a prefix and
> not about functionality?

Yeah, st_cc_buf() is not a good name.  I've gone with
"configure_connector_st()" which I hope will be better.

> 
> 
> 
> >+{
> >+    cpu_physical_memory_write(ppc64_phys_to_real(addr + offset),
> >+                              buf, MIN(len, CC_WA_LEN - offset));
> >+}
> >+
> >  static void rtas_ibm_configure_connector(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >                                           sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> >                                           uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> >@@ -526,6 +533,7 @@ static void rtas_ibm_configure_connector(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >      }
> >
> >      wa_addr = ((uint64_t)rtas_ld(args, 1) << 32) | rtas_ld(args, 0);
> >+    wa_addr = ppc64_phys_to_real(wa_addr);
> 
> 
> Not needed here, st_cc_buf() also does ppc64_phys_to_real().

Good point, corrected.

> >
> >      drc_index = rtas_ld(wa_addr, 0);
> >      drc = spapr_dr_connector_by_index(drc_index);
> >@@ -569,8 +577,7 @@ static void rtas_ibm_configure_connector(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >              /* provide the name of the next OF node */
> >              wa_offset = CC_VAL_DATA_OFFSET;
> >              rtas_st(wa_addr, CC_IDX_NODE_NAME_OFFSET, wa_offset);
> >-            rtas_st_buffer_direct(wa_addr + wa_offset, CC_WA_LEN - 
> >wa_offset,
> >-                                  (uint8_t *)name, strlen(name) + 1);
> >+            st_cc_buf(wa_addr, wa_offset, (uint8_t *)name, strlen(name) + 
> >1);
> 
> 
> Since you made @buf a void* in st_cc_buf(), you do not need (uint8_t*) here
> and below.

Ah, yes good point also.

> 
> 
> 
> >              resp = SPAPR_DR_CC_RESPONSE_NEXT_CHILD;
> >              break;
> >          case FDT_END_NODE:
> >@@ -595,8 +602,7 @@ static void rtas_ibm_configure_connector(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >              /* provide the name of the next OF property */
> >              wa_offset = CC_VAL_DATA_OFFSET;
> >              rtas_st(wa_addr, CC_IDX_PROP_NAME_OFFSET, wa_offset);
> >-            rtas_st_buffer_direct(wa_addr + wa_offset, CC_WA_LEN - 
> >wa_offset,
> >-                                  (uint8_t *)name, strlen(name) + 1);
> >+            st_cc_buf(wa_addr, wa_offset, (uint8_t *)name, strlen(name) + 
> >1);
> >
> >              /* provide the length and value of the OF property. data gets
> >               * placed immediately after NULL terminator of the OF 
> > property's
> >@@ -605,9 +611,8 @@ static void rtas_ibm_configure_connector(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> >              wa_offset += strlen(name) + 1,
> >              rtas_st(wa_addr, CC_IDX_PROP_LEN, prop_len);
> >              rtas_st(wa_addr, CC_IDX_PROP_DATA_OFFSET, wa_offset);
> >-            rtas_st_buffer_direct(wa_addr + wa_offset, CC_WA_LEN - 
> >wa_offset,
> >-                                  (uint8_t *)((struct fdt_property 
> >*)prop)->data,
> >-                                  prop_len);
> >+            st_cc_buf(wa_addr, wa_offset,
> >+                      (uint8_t *)((struct fdt_property *)prop)->data, 
> >prop_len);
> >              resp = SPAPR_DR_CC_RESPONSE_NEXT_PROPERTY;
> >              break;
> >          case FDT_END:
> >diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >index ec9e7ea..d6f4eb4 100644
> >--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> >@@ -505,14 +505,6 @@ static inline void rtas_st(target_ulong phys, int n, 
> >uint32_t val)
> >      stl_be_phys(&address_space_memory, ppc64_phys_to_real(phys + 4*n), 
> > val);
> >  }
> >
> >-static inline void rtas_st_buffer_direct(target_ulong phys,
> >-                                         target_ulong phys_len,
> >-                                         uint8_t *buffer, uint16_t 
> >buffer_len)
> >-{
> >-    cpu_physical_memory_write(ppc64_phys_to_real(phys), buffer,
> >-                              MIN(buffer_len, phys_len));
> >-}
> >-
> >  typedef void (*spapr_rtas_fn)(PowerPCCPU *cpu, sPAPRMachineState *sm,
> >                                uint32_t token,
> >                                uint32_t nargs, target_ulong args,
> >
> 
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]