qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE TPM


From: Stefan Berger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE TPM
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:13:15 -0500

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> wrote on 01/20/2016 11:03:11 AM:

> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>


> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/4] Provide support for the CUSE TPM
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:54:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > On 01/20/2016 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:31:56AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >>"Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> wrote on 01/20/2016 10:00:41
> > >>AM:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>process at all - it would make sense if there was a single
> > >>>swtpm_cuse shared across all QEMU's, but if there's one per
> > >>>QEMU device, it feels like it'd be much simpler to just have
> > >>>the functionality linked in QEMU.  That avoids the problem
> > >>I tried having it linked in QEMU before. It was basically rejected.
> > >I remember an impl you did many years(?) ago now, but don't recall
> > >the results of the discussion. Can you elaborate on why it was
> > >rejected as an approach ? It just doesn't make much sense to me
> > >to have to create an external daemon, a CUSE device and comms
> > >protocol, simply to be able to read/write a plain file containing
> > >the TPM state. Its massive over engineering IMHO and adding way
> > >more complexity and thus scope for failure
> >
> > The TPM 1.2 implementation adds 10s of thousands of lines of code.The TPM 2
> > implementation is in the same range. The concern was having this code right
> > in the QEMU address space. It's big, it can have bugs, so we don't want it
> > to harm QEMU. So we now put this into an external process implemented by the
> > swtpm project that builds on libtpms which provides TPM 1.2 functionality
> > (to be extended with TPM 2). We cannot call APIs of libtpms directly
> > anymore, so we need a control channel, which is implemented through ioctls
> > on the CUSE device.
> >
> >    Stefan
>
> If that's the only reason for it, you can package it as part of QEMU
> source, run it as a sub-process.



I am packaging libtpms in Fedora. Once we have the CUSE interface in QEMU, I would package the swtpm project for Fedora as well. Both projects have at least been prepared for Debian packaging also.

https://github.com/stefanberger/libtpms
https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm

The 'dist' directory has the spec file.

If I would combine things, then on the libvirt layer. Introduce an RPM dependency there.

I doubt I will have the possibility to go back to integrating it directly into QEMU directly.

Regards,
   Stefan


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]