Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] vGPU core driver : to provide common interface for vGPU.

[Neo Jia]

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:18:44AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Neo Jia [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 4:13 PM
> > 
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:00:43AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >   Hi,
> > >
> > > > And for UUID, I remember Alex had a concern on using it in kernel.
> > > > Honestly speaking I don't have a good idea here. In Xen side there is a 
> > > > VM ID
> > > > which can be easily used as the index. But for KVM, what would be the 
> > > > best
> > > > identifier to associate with a VM?
> > >
> > > The vgpu code doesn't need to associate the vgpu device with a vm in the
> > > first place.  You get all guest address space information from qemu, via
> > > vfio iommu interface.
> > >
> > > When qemu does't use kvm (tcg mode), things should still work fine.
> > > Using vfio-based vgpu devices with non-qemu apps (some kind of test
> > > suite for example) should work fine too.
> > 
> > Hi Gerd and Kevin,
> > 
> > I thought Alex had agreed with the UUID as long as it is not tied with VM,
> > probably it is just his comment gets lost in our previous long email thread.
> > 
> 
> I think the point is... what is the value to introduce a UUID here? If
> what Gerd describes is enough, we can simply invent a vgpu ID which
> is returned at vgpu_create, and then used as the index for other
> interfaces.
> 

Hi Kevin,

It can just be a plain UUID, and the meaning of the UUID is up to upper layer 
SW, for
example with libvirt, you can create a new "vgpu group" object representing a
list of vgpu device. so the UUID will be the input on vgpu_create instead of
return value.

For the TCG mode, this should just work as long as libvirt can create the proper
internal objects there plus other vfio iommu interface Gerd has called out,
although the vector->kvm_interrupt part might need some tweaks.

Thanks,
Neo

> But I still need to think about whether there's value to have a VM
> identifier within vgpu core driver, especially regarding to how this
> vgpu core driver connects to KVM hypervisor or other hypervisor.
> I saw another long thread about that part. Jike has started his 
> vacation now. I'll follow up with it tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks
> Kevin