qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/4] SysFS driver for QEMU fw_cfg device


From: Greg KH
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/4] SysFS driver for QEMU fw_cfg device
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:38:28 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:47:29PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jan, at 09:23:10AM, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
> > From: "Gabriel Somlo" <address@hidden>
> > 
> > Allow access to QEMU firmware blobs, passed into the guest VM via
> > the fw_cfg device, through SysFS entries. Blob meta-data (e.g. name,
> > size, and fw_cfg key), as well as the raw binary blob data may be
> > accessed.
> > 
> > The SysFS access location is /sys/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg/... and was
> > selected based on overall similarity to the type of information
> > exposed under /sys/firmware/dmi/entries/...
> > 
> > This functionality is primarily intended to serve as a host->guest
> > configuration data transfer mechanism that is both:
> > 
> >         - asynchronous: the host doesn't need to wait for the guest
> >                         to be ready to accept data (e.g., by starting
> >                         an agent daemon)
> > 
> >         - out-of-band:  there is no need to commandeer a guest element
> >                         normally visible and available to the guest user
> >                         (e.g., kernel cmdline, mounting floppy/cdrom, etc.)
> > 
> > QEMU now allows arbitrary fw_cfg blobs to be added via the command line,
> > so it would be nice to make them easy to retrieve from within the guest
> > OS, and the niceset and easiest way I can think of is
> > 
> >         cat /sys/firmware/qemu-fw-cfg/.../<some-blob-name>/raw
> > 
> > New since v7:
> > 
> >     - kbuild testbot complained about a warning on ia64, so limit
> >       the availability of fw_cfg in Kconfig to only architectures
> >       on which QEMU makes it available, which include:
> > 
> >             (ARM || ARM64 || PPC_PMAC || SPARC || X86)
> 
> This is looking pretty good now. Does anyone have remaining
> objections before this gets merged?

All now merged in my tree, thanks.

greg k-h



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]