qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] qmp: add query-block-dirty-bitmap-ranges


From: Denis V. Lunev
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] qmp: add query-block-dirty-bitmap-ranges
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:36:07 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 02/10/2016 06:26 PM, John Snow wrote:

On 02/10/2016 08:57 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 02/10/2016 01:08 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 01:56:30PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
wrote:
Add qmp command to query dirty bitmap contents. This is needed for
external backup.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
---
   block/dirty-bitmap.c         | 55
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   blockdev.c                   | 62
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   include/block/dirty-bitmap.h |  7 +++++
   qapi/block-core.json         | 54
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   qmp-commands.hx              | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++
   5 files changed, 211 insertions(+)
This API produces large replies and/or requires many calls to fetch all
bitmap data.  The worst case is a 101010... bitmap.

I consider the dirty bitmap to be data (vs control) and not something
that should be sent over a control channel like the QMP monitor.

How about writing the dirty bitmap to a file?  The new bitmap file
format that Fam is working on could be used.  That way the dirty bitmap
can be saved asynchronously without hogging the QMP monitor.
Reasonable point.

May be it would be better to setup "special" NBD server inside
QEMU which will allow to directly "read" bitmap data.

Any opinion?

Den
Or perhaps something like migration, where the client receiving the data
opens a socket of some sort, and QEMU connects to that socket to send
the data.
no. The point is that QEMU should be queried for data.
May be even via several sockets to provide it in
parallel.

Den



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]