[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-02-16
From: |
Juan Quintela |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for agenda for 2016-02-16 |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:51:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:54:57PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> So my quick and dirty summary of CPU as _I_ understand it
>> (and I only have some part time bandwidth at the moment for that)
>>
>> x86 has cpu hotplug. Some history
>> qemu-kvm had cpu_set in the past
>> qemu has cpu_add for a while now
>> libvirt code uses cpu_add cross-platform out of the box
>>
>> proposal to use device_add. Currently this has the following issues that
>> we need to discuss:
>> - will require capability checking and dual code in libvirt (and libvirt
>> updates)
>> - Power has some constraints that are hard to model with just device add
>> - David Gibson proposes a two layer interface
>> - low level: device add cpu-package
>> - high level
>> - David Hildenbrand has some concerns regarding CPU models (with base model
>> + feature
>> on/off), as device_add needs instantiatable type
>> - devel_del: s390 has no interface for cpu removal (Matts latest patches
>> reset the
>> machine just like z/VM - until we have some interface)
>> - anything else? (cpu hotplug on ARM or MIPS?)
>>
>> Would be good to use todays call to have a plan how to finish things soon.
>> (maybe even for 2.6)
>
> Did the call happen? I am away from work for most days during the
> next 2 weeks, so I couldn't attend.
Yeap. I sent some minutes, but they are kind of incoherent, I hope that
Andreas or Christian fill the holes...
Later, Juan.