qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v7 09/16] softmmu: Include MMIO/invalid exclusive accesses
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:26:56 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.0.91.4

alvise rigo <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Alvise Rigo <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Enable exclusive accesses when the MMIO/invalid flag is set in the TLB
>>> entry.
>>>
>>> In case a LL access is done to MMIO memory, we treat it differently from
>>> a RAM access in that we do not rely on the EXCL bitmap to flag the page
>>> as exclusive. In fact, we don't even need the TLB_EXCL flag to force the
>>> slow path, since it is always forced anyway.
>>>
>>> This commit does not take care of invalidating an MMIO exclusive range from
>>> other non-exclusive accesses i.e. CPU1 LoadLink to MMIO address X and
>>> CPU2 writes to X. This will be addressed in the following commit.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Jani Kokkonen <address@hidden>
>>> Suggested-by: Claudio Fontana <address@hidden>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>>  cputlb.c           |  7 +++----
>>>  softmmu_template.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cputlb.c b/cputlb.c
>>> index aa9cc17..87d09c8 100644
>>> --- a/cputlb.c
>>> +++ b/cputlb.c
>>> @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, 
>>> target_ulong vaddr,
>>>          if ((memory_region_is_ram(section->mr) && section->readonly)
>>>              || memory_region_is_romd(section->mr)) {
>>>              /* Write access calls the I/O callback.  */
>>> -            te->addr_write = address | TLB_MMIO;
>>> +            address |= TLB_MMIO;
>>>          } else if (memory_region_is_ram(section->mr)
>>>                     && cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(section->mr->ram_addr
>>>                                                     + xlat)) {
>>> @@ -437,11 +437,10 @@ void tlb_set_page_with_attrs(CPUState *cpu, 
>>> target_ulong vaddr,
>>>              if (cpu_physical_memory_is_excl(section->mr->ram_addr + xlat)) 
>>> {
>>>                  /* There is at least one vCPU that has flagged the address 
>>> as
>>>                   * exclusive. */
>>> -                te->addr_write = address | TLB_EXCL;
>>> -            } else {
>>> -                te->addr_write = address;
>>> +                address |= TLB_EXCL;
>>>              }
>>>          }
>>> +        te->addr_write = address;
>>
>> As mentioned before I think this bit belongs in the earlier patch.
>>
>>>      } else {
>>>          te->addr_write = -1;
>>>      }
>>> diff --git a/softmmu_template.h b/softmmu_template.h
>>> index 267c52a..c54bdc9 100644
>>> --- a/softmmu_template.h
>>> +++ b/softmmu_template.h
>>> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
>>> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>>>
>>>      /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
>>>      if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
>>> -        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
>>> +        if (tlb_addr & TLB_EXCL) {
>>>              CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
>>>              CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>>>              CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> @@ -500,8 +500,15 @@ void helper_le_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
>>> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>>>                  }
>>>              }
>>>
>>> -            glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
>>> -                                                    mmu_idx, index, 
>>> retaddr);
>>> +            if (tlb_addr & ~(TARGET_PAGE_MASK | TLB_EXCL)) { /* MMIO
>>> access */
>>
>> What about the other flags? Shouldn't this be tlb_addr & TLB_MMIO?
>
> The upstream QEMU's condition to follow the IO access path is:
> if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK))
> Now, we split this in:
> if (tlb_addr & TLB_EXCL)
> for RAM exclusive accesses and
> if (tlb_addr & ~(TARGET_PAGE_MASK | TLB_EXCL))
> for IO accesses. In this last case, we handle also the IO exclusive
> accesses.

OK I see that now. Thanks.

>
>>
>>> +                glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, 
>>> oi,
>>> +                                                         mmu_idx, index,
>>> +                                                         retaddr);
>>> +            } else {
>>> +                glue(helper_le_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
>>> +                                                        mmu_idx, index,
>>> +                                                        retaddr);
>>> +            }
>>>
>>>              lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);
>>>
>>> @@ -620,7 +627,7 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
>>> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>>>
>>>      /* Handle an IO access or exclusive access.  */
>>>      if (unlikely(tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK)) {
>>> -        if ((tlb_addr & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == TLB_EXCL) {
>>> +        if (tlb_addr & TLB_EXCL) {
>>>              CPUIOTLBEntry *iotlbentry = &env->iotlb[mmu_idx][index];
>>>              CPUState *cpu = ENV_GET_CPU(env);
>>>              CPUClass *cc = CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
>>> @@ -644,8 +651,15 @@ void helper_be_st_name(CPUArchState *env, target_ulong 
>>> addr, DATA_TYPE val,
>>>                  }
>>>              }
>>>
>>> -            glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
>>> -                                                    mmu_idx, index, 
>>> retaddr);
>>> +            if (tlb_addr & ~(TARGET_PAGE_MASK | TLB_EXCL)) { /* MMIO 
>>> access */
>>> +                glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_mmio_access)(env, val, addr, 
>>> oi,
>>> +                                                         mmu_idx, index,
>>> +                                                         retaddr);
>>> +            } else {
>>> +                glue(helper_be_st_name, _do_ram_access)(env, val, addr, oi,
>>> +                                                        mmu_idx, index,
>>> +                                                        retaddr);
>>> +            }
>>>
>>>              lookup_and_reset_cpus_ll_addr(hw_addr, DATA_SIZE);
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Bennée


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]