qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/11] target-arm: In v8, make illegal AArch32 m


From: Sergey Fedorov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/11] target-arm: In v8, make illegal AArch32 mode changes set PSTATE.IL
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:44:00 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 15.02.2016 20:22, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In v8, the illegal mode changes which are UNPREDICTABLE in v7 are
> given architected behaviour:
>  * the mode field is unchanged
>  * PSTATE.IL is set (so any subsequent instructions will UNDEF)
>  * any other CPSR fields are written to as normal
>
> This is pretty much the same behaviour we picked for our
> UNPREDICTABLE handling, with the exception that for v8 we
> need to set the IL bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>

> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index e7b3eb3..69e93a2 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -5291,11 +5291,20 @@ void cpsr_write(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t val, 
> uint32_t mask,
>          (env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_M) != CPSR_USER &&
>          ((env->uncached_cpsr ^ val) & mask & CPSR_M)) {
>          if (bad_mode_switch(env, val & CPSR_M)) {
> -            /* Attempt to switch to an invalid mode: this is UNPREDICTABLE.
> -             * We choose to ignore the attempt and leave the CPSR M field
> -             * untouched.
> +            /* Attempt to switch to an invalid mode: this is UNPREDICTABLE in
> +             * v7, and has defined behaviour in v8:
> +             *  + leave CPSR.M untouched
> +             *  + allow changes to the other CPSR fields
> +             *  + set PSTATE.IL
> +             * For user changes via the GDB stub, we don't set PSTATE.IL,
> +             * as this would be unnecessarily harsh for a user error.
>               */
>              mask &= ~CPSR_M;
> +            if (write_type != CPSRWriteByGDBStub &&
> +                arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_V8)) {
> +                mask |= CPSR_IL;
> +                val |= CPSR_IL;
> +            }
>          } else {
>              switch_mode(env, val & CPSR_M);
>          }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]