qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 33/42] ivshmem: Implement shm=... with a memo


From: Marc-André Lureau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 33/42] ivshmem: Implement shm=... with a memory backend
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:31:25 +0100

Hi

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> ivshmem has its very own code to create and map shared memory.
> Replace that with an implicitly created memory backend.  Reduces the
> number of ways we create BAR 2 from three to two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 79 
> ++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> index 1c25621..747f9c3 100644
> --- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> +++ b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #include "migration/migration.h"
>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>  #include "qemu/event_notifier.h"
> +#include "qom/object_interfaces.h"
>  #include "sysemu/char.h"
>  #include "sysemu/hostmem.h"
>  #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> @@ -369,31 +370,6 @@ static int check_shm_size(IVShmemState *s, int fd, Error 
> **errp)
>      }
>  }
>
> -/* create the shared memory BAR when we are not using the server, so we can
> - * create the BAR and map the memory immediately */
> -static int create_shared_memory_BAR(IVShmemState *s, int fd, uint8_t attr,
> -                                    Error **errp)
> -{
> -    void * ptr;
> -
> -    ptr = mmap(0, s->ivshmem_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
> -    if (ptr == MAP_FAILED) {
> -        error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "Failed to mmap shared memory");
> -        return -1;
> -    }
> -
> -    memory_region_init_ram_ptr(&s->ivshmem, OBJECT(s), "ivshmem.bar2",
> -                               s->ivshmem_size, ptr);
> -    qemu_set_ram_fd(s->ivshmem.ram_addr, fd);
> -    vmstate_register_ram(&s->ivshmem, DEVICE(s));
> -    memory_region_add_subregion(&s->bar, 0, &s->ivshmem);
> -
> -    /* region for shared memory */
> -    pci_register_bar(PCI_DEVICE(s), 2, attr, &s->bar);
> -
> -    return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void ivshmem_add_eventfd(IVShmemState *s, int posn, int i)
>  {
>      memory_region_add_eventfd(&s->ivshmem_mmio,
> @@ -833,6 +809,23 @@ static void ivshmem_write_config(PCIDevice *pdev, 
> uint32_t address,
>      }
>  }
>
> +static void desugar_shm(IVShmemState *s)
> +{
> +    Object *obj;
> +    char *path;
> +
> +    obj = object_new("memory-backend-file");
> +    path = g_strdup_printf("/dev/shm/%s", s->shmobj);
> +    object_property_set_str(obj, path, "mem-path", &error_abort);
> +    g_free(path);
> +    object_property_set_int(obj, s->ivshmem_size, "size", &error_abort);
> +    object_property_set_bool(obj, true, "share", &error_abort);
> +    object_property_add_child(OBJECT(s), "internal-shm-backend", obj,
> +                              &error_abort);
> +    user_creatable_complete(obj, &error_abort);
> +    s->hostmem = MEMORY_BACKEND(obj);
> +}
> +
>  static void pci_ivshmem_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
>  {
>      IVShmemState *s = IVSHMEM(dev);
> @@ -911,6 +904,10 @@ static void pci_ivshmem_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          attr |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
>      }
>
> +    if (s->shmobj) {
> +        desugar_shm(s);
> +    }
> +
>      if (s->hostmem != NULL) {
>          MemoryRegion *mr;
>
> @@ -921,7 +918,7 @@ static void pci_ivshmem_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          vmstate_register_ram(mr, DEVICE(s));
>          memory_region_add_subregion(&s->bar, 0, mr);
>          pci_register_bar(PCI_DEVICE(s), 2, attr, &s->bar);
> -    } else if (s->server_chr != NULL) {
> +    } else {
>          IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("using shared memory server (socket = %s)\n",
>                          s->server_chr->filename);
>
> @@ -948,36 +945,6 @@ static void pci_ivshmem_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>              error_setg(errp, "failed to initialize interrupts");
>              return;
>          }
> -    } else {
> -        /* just map the file immediately, we're not using a server */
> -        int fd;
> -
> -        IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("using shm_open (shm object = %s)\n", s->shmobj);
> -
> -        /* try opening with O_EXCL and if it succeeds zero the memory
> -         * by truncating to 0 */
> -        if ((fd = shm_open(s->shmobj, O_CREAT|O_RDWR|O_EXCL,
> -                        S_IRWXU|S_IRWXG|S_IRWXO)) > 0) {

Nice patch, but it's worth pointing out that qemu file_ram_alloc()
creates file with open O_CREAT. Here you rely on the fact that
/dev/shm is present and file inside maps to POSIX shared memory object
names. That's a lot more restrictive than using shm_open().
Furthermore, the permissions are not the same. The current code uses
777 for some reasons, while qemu file_ram_alloc() is 644. I am not
convinced the cleanup is worth these braking changes, especially the
restriction to Linux only.

> -           /* truncate file to length PCI device's memory */
> -            if (ftruncate(fd, s->ivshmem_size) != 0) {
> -                error_report("could not truncate shared file");
> -            }
> -
> -        } else if ((fd = shm_open(s->shmobj, O_CREAT|O_RDWR,
> -                        S_IRWXU|S_IRWXG|S_IRWXO)) < 0) {
> -            error_setg(errp, "could not open shared file");
> -            return;
> -        }
> -
> -        if (check_shm_size(s, fd, errp) == -1) {
> -            return;
> -        }
> -
> -        create_shared_memory_BAR(s, fd, attr, &err);
> -        if (err) {
> -            error_propagate(errp, err);
> -            return;
> -        }
>      }
>
>      if (s->role_val == IVSHMEM_PEER) {
> --
> 2.4.3
>
>



-- 
Marc-André Lureau



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]