qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/5] replay: introduce new checkpoint for ico


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/5] replay: introduce new checkpoint for icount warp
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:24:21 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0


On 10/03/2016 10:10, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote:
>> > The start would be where you call qemu_clock_warp(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, 
>> > false):
>> > 
>> >     if (!use_icount) {
>> >         return;
>> >     }
>> >     if (!runstate_is_running()) {
>> >         return;
>> >     }
>> >     if (!replay_checkpoint(CHECKPOINT_CLOCK_WARP_START)) {
>> >         return;
>> >     }
>> >     /* I think calling icount_warp_rt here is unnecessary.  */
>> >     if (!all_cpu_threads_idle()) {
>> >         return;
>> >     }
>> >     if (qtest_enabled()) {
>> >         /* When testing, qtest commands advance icount.  */
>> >         return;
>> >     }
>> > 
>> >     /* We want to use the earliest deadline from ALL vm_clocks */
>> >     clock = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL_RT);
>> >     deadline = qemu_clock_deadline_ns_all(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL);
>> >     ...
>> > 
>> > The end or account function, instead, would be called from tcg_exec_all()
>> > and also from icount_dummy_timer() (this is what makes the call to
>> > icount_warp_rt unnecessary above):
> Why icount_warp_rt is unnecessary? There is no code to proceed the virtual 
> clock.
> Then qemu_start_warp_timer will forever setup the timer without any progress.

If icount_warp_rt is called from icount_dummy_timer(), the virtual clock
will be updated as soon as the VIRTUAL_RT clock reaches the deadline.
It's a much more reasonable place to call icount_warp_rt from (if it
works...).

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]