Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4] hw/pxb: add chassis_nr property

[Cao jin]

Hi,

On 03/03/2016 10:18 PM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Add a chassis_nr property instead of using PXB bus number
> as internal bridge's chassis nr.
>
> Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> ---
> v3->v4:
>   - re-coded to fit current codebase
> v2->v3:
>   - use bus nr if chassis nr is 0 (Micahel S. Tsirkin)
> v1->v2:
>   - Rebased on master
>
>   docs/pci_expander_bridge.txt        |  7 +++----
>   hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> @@ -286,6 +294,8 @@ static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
>       /* Note: 0 is not a legal a PXB bus number. */

better remove the latter "a", or I guess it will conflict with my 
previous pxb cleanup patch.

>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
>       DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
> +    /* Note: 0 is not a legal chassis number. */
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("chassis_nr", PXBDev, chassis_nr, 0),
>       DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>   };
>
> @@ -322,6 +332,13 @@ static int pxb_pcie_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
>       return pxb_dev_init_common(dev, true);
>   }
>
> +static Property pxb_pcie_dev_properties[] = {
> +    /* Note: 0 is not a legal a PXB bus number. */

likewise

> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
> +    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> +};

And I have another personal question: In qemu design, it seems every pci 
bridge reside in a separate chassis, what`s benefit?  why don`t put them 
all in the main chassis?

--
Yours Sincerely,

Cao jin