qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/acpi: fix GSI links UID


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/acpi: fix GSI links UID
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:03:58 +0200

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 02:17:04PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 07:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 13/03/2016 12:40, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> >>According to the ACPI spec, each UID must be unique.
> >>Use the irq number as UID for GSI links.
> >>
> >>Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> >
> >This causes a warning from acpi-test.  The diff is
> >
> >2720c2720
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x10)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2747c2747
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x11)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2774c2774
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x12)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2801c2801
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x13)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2828c2828
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x14)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2855c2855
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x15)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2882c2882
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x16)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >2909c2909
> ><             Name (_UID, Zero)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >---
> >>             Name (_UID, 0x17)  // _UID: Unique ID
> >
> >I think you should have updated tests/acpi-test-data.
> 
> Thanks Paolo, you are right.
> 
> I am "used to" Michael updating the test data on his pull request.
> I can send an update myself, it will have to wait a few days.
> 
> Thanks,
> Marcel
> 
> >
> >Paolo
> >

True, I forgot to include this in the pull request.
Fixed, upstream is fine now.

Thanks for the reminder!

-- 
MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]