qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/35] ehci: make idt processing more robust


From: Michael Roth
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/35] ehci: make idt processing more robust
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:27:59 -0500

From: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>

Make ehci_process_itd return an error in case we didn't do any actual
iso transfer because we've found no active transaction.  That'll avoid
ehci happily run in circles forever if the guest builds a loop out of
idts.

This is CVE-2015-8558.

Cc: address@hidden
Reported-by: Qinghao Tang <address@hidden>
Tested-by: P J P <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden>
(cherry picked from commit 156a2e4dbffa85997636a7a39ef12da6f1b40254)
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>
---
 hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
index 4e2161b..d07f228 100644
--- a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
+++ b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ static int ehci_process_itd(EHCIState *ehci,
 {
     USBDevice *dev;
     USBEndpoint *ep;
-    uint32_t i, len, pid, dir, devaddr, endp;
+    uint32_t i, len, pid, dir, devaddr, endp, xfers = 0;
     uint32_t pg, off, ptr1, ptr2, max, mult;
 
     ehci->periodic_sched_active = PERIODIC_ACTIVE;
@@ -1479,9 +1479,10 @@ static int ehci_process_itd(EHCIState *ehci,
                 ehci_raise_irq(ehci, USBSTS_INT);
             }
             itd->transact[i] &= ~ITD_XACT_ACTIVE;
+            xfers++;
         }
     }
-    return 0;
+    return xfers ? 0 : -1;
 }
 
 
-- 
1.9.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]