qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Design Doc]Speed up live migration by skipping fre


From: Li, Liang Z
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC Design Doc]Speed up live migration by skipping free pages
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:05:16 +0000


OnĀ %D, %SN wrote:
%Q

%C

Liang


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 11:57 PM
> To: Li, Liang Z
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert; Wei Yang; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden;
> address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [RFC Design Doc]Speed up live migration by skipping free pages
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:53:25PM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote:
> > > > > > Not very complex, we can implement like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Set all the bits in the migration_bitmap_rcu->bmap to 1 2.
> > > > > > Clear all the bits in ram_list.
> > > > > > dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]
> > > > > > 3. Send the get_free_page_bitmap request 4. Start to send
> > > > > > pages to destination and check if the free_page_bitmap is ready
> > > > > >     if (is_ready) {
> > > > > >           filter out the free pages from  
> > > > > > migration_bitmap_rcu->bmap;
> > > > > >           migration_bitmap_sync();
> > > > > >     }
> > > > > >      continue until live migration complete.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is that right?
> > > > >
> > > > > The order I'm trying to understand is something like:
> > > > >
> > > > >     a) Send the get_free_page_bitmap request
> > > > >     b) Start sending pages
> > > > >     c) Reach the end of memory
> > > > >       [ is_ready is false - guest hasn't made free map yet ]
> > > > >     d) normal migration_bitmap_sync() at end of first pass
> > > > >     e) Carry on sending dirty pages
> > > > >     f) is_ready is true
> > > > >       f.1) filter out free pages?
> > > > >       f.2) migration_bitmap_sync()
> > > > >
> > > > > It's f.1 I'm worried about.  If the guest started generating the
> > > > > free bitmap before (d), then a page marked as 'free' in f.1
> > > > > might have become dirty before (d) and so (f.2) doesn't set the
> > > > > dirty again, and so we can't filter out pages in f.1.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > As you described, the order is incorrect.
> > > >
> > > > Liang
> > >
> > >
> > > So to make it safe, what is required is to make sure no free list us
> > > outstanding before calling migration_bitmap_sync.
> > >
> > > If one is outstanding, filter out pages before calling
> migration_bitmap_sync.
> > >
> > > Of course, if we just do it like we normally do with migration, then
> > > by the time we call migration_bitmap_sync dirty bitmap is completely
> > > empty, so there won't be anything to filter out.
> > >
> > > One way to address this is call migration_bitmap_sync in the IO
> > > handler, while VCPU is stopped, then make sure to filter out pages
> > > before the next migration_bitmap_sync.
> > >
> > > Another is to start filtering out pages upon IO handler, but make
> > > sure to flush the queue before calling migration_bitmap_sync.
> > >
> >
> > It's really complex, maybe we should switch to a simple start,  just
> > skip the free page in the ram bulk stage and make it asynchronous?
> >
> > Liang
> 
> You mean like your patches do? No, blocking bulk migration until guest
> response is basically a non-starter.
> 

No, don't wait anymore. Like below (copy from previous thread)
--------------------------------------------------------------
1. Set all the bits in the migration_bitmap_rcu->bmap to 1 
2. Clear all the bits in ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]
3. Send the get_free_page_bitmap request 
4. Start to send  pages to destination and check if the free_page_bitmap is 
ready
   if (is_ready) {
     filter out the free pages from  migration_bitmap_rcu->bmap;
     migration_bitmap_sync();
 }
continue until live migration complete.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Can this work?

Liang

> --
> MST



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]