[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2.1 08/12] spapr: Add CPU type specific cor
|
From: |
David Gibson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2.1 08/12] spapr: Add CPU type specific core devices |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 Apr 2016 16:08:44 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:09:17PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Introduce core devices for each CPU type supported by sPAPR. These
> core devices are derived from the base spapr-cpu-core device type.
>
> TODO:
> - Add core types for other remaining CPU types
> - Handle CPU model alias correctly
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 3 +-
> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 118
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 1 +
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 36 ++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 64c4acc..45ac5dc 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1614,8 +1614,7 @@ static void spapr_boot_set(void *opaque, const char
> *boot_device,
> machine->boot_order = g_strdup(boot_device);
> }
>
> -static void spapr_cpu_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> - Error **errp)
> +void spapr_cpu_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> {
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> index 8cbe2a5..3751a54 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
> @@ -22,9 +22,127 @@ static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_info = {
> .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore),
> };
>
> +#define DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(_name)
> \
> +static void
> \
> +glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_create_threads)(DeviceState *dev, int threads,
> \
> + Error **errp)
> \
> +{
> \
> + int i;
> \
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> \
> + sPAPRCPUCore *sc = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> \
> + glue(_name, sPAPRCPUCore) * core =
> \
> + glue(_name, _SPAPR_CPU_CORE)(OBJECT(dev));
> \
> +
> \
> + for (i = 0; i < threads; i++) {
> \
> + char id[32];
> \
> +
> \
> + object_initialize(&sc->threads[i], sizeof(sc->threads[i]),
> \
> + object_class_get_name(core->cpu));
> \
> + snprintf(id, sizeof(id), "thread[%d]", i);
> \
> + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(core), id, OBJECT(&sc->threads[i]),
> \
> + &local_err);
> \
> + if (local_err) {
> \
> + goto err;
> \
> + }
> \
> + }
> \
> + return;
> \
> +
> \
> +err:
> \
> + while (--i) {
> \
> + object_unparent(OBJECT(&sc->threads[i]));
> \
> + }
> \
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> \
> +}
> \
> +
> \
> +static int
> \
> +glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_realize_child)(Object *child, void *opaque)
> \
> +{
> \
> + Error **errp = opaque;
> \
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
> \
> + CPUState *cs = CPU(child);
> \
> + PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(cs);
> \
> +
> \
> + object_property_set_bool(child, true, "realized", errp);
> \
> + if (*errp) {
> \
> + return 1;
> \
> + }
> \
> +
> \
> + spapr_cpu_init(spapr, cpu, errp);
> \
> + if (*errp) {
> \
> + return 1;
> \
> + }
> \
> + return 0;
> \
> +}
> \
If you put the ObjectClass * for the threads in the base abstract
class's class structure, then you can move most of this logic to the
abstract class as well and make the macro-ized stuff much smaller.
The realize_child stuff doesn't even need the ObjectClass* in the base
class to factor out.
> +static void
> \
> +glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_realize)(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> \
> +{
> \
> + sPAPRCPUCore *sc = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> \
> + CPUCore *cc = CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev));
> \
> + Error *local_err = NULL;
> \
> +
> \
> + /*
> \
> + * TODO: This is CPU model specific CPU core's realize routine.
> \
> + * However I am initializing "threads" field of the parent type
> \
> + * sPAPRCPUCore here. Is this ok ? If not I will have make "threads"
> \
> + * part of CPU model specific CPU core type and have different plug()
> \
> + * handlers for each type instead of having a common plug() handler
> \
> + * for all core types.
> \
> + */
> \
> + sc->threads = g_new0(PowerPCCPU, cc->threads);
> \
> + glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_create_threads)(dev, cc->threads,
> &local_err); \
> + if (local_err) {
> \
> + goto out;
> \
> + }
> \
> +
> \
> + object_child_foreach(OBJECT(dev),
> \
> + glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_realize_child),
> \
> + &local_err);
> \
> +
> \
> +out:
> \
> + if (local_err) {
> \
> + g_free(sc->threads);
> \
> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> \
> + }
> \
> +}
> \
> +
> \
> +static void
> \
> +glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_instance_init)(Object *obj)
> \
> +{
> \
> + glue(_name, sPAPRCPUCore) * core = glue(_name, _SPAPR_CPU_CORE)(obj);
> \
> + const char *type = stringify(_name) "-" TYPE_POWERPC_CPU;
> \
> + ObjectClass *oc = object_class_by_name(type);
> \
> +
> \
> + core->cpu = oc;
> \
> +}
> \
> +
> \
> +static void
> \
> +glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_class_init)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> \
> +{
> \
> +
> \
> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> \
> + dc->realize = glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_realize);
> \
I think the only callback you should need to construct in the macro is
class_init to initialize the ObjectClass* field.
> +}
> \
> +
> \
> +static const TypeInfo glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_type_info) =
> \
> +{
> \
> + .name = stringify(_name) "-" TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> \
> + .parent = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE,
> \
> + .instance_size = sizeof(glue(_name, sPAPRCPUCore)),
> \
> + .instance_init = glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_instance_init),
> \
> + .class_init = glue(_name, _spapr_cpu_core_class_init),
> \
> +};
> +
> +DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(host);
> +DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(POWER7);
> +DEFINE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(POWER8);
> +
> static void spapr_cpu_core_register_types(void)
> {
> type_register_static(&spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> + type_register_static(&host_spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> + type_register_static(&POWER7_spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> + type_register_static(&POWER8_spapr_cpu_core_type_info);
> }
>
> type_init(spapr_cpu_core_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index 098d85d..0fdf448 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ void spapr_hotplug_req_add_by_count(sPAPRDRConnectorType
> drc_type,
> uint32_t count);
> void spapr_hotplug_req_remove_by_count(sPAPRDRConnectorType drc_type,
> uint32_t count);
> +void spapr_cpu_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>
> /* rtas-configure-connector state */
> struct sPAPRConfigureConnectorState {
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> index e3340ea..71e69c0 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h
> @@ -24,4 +24,40 @@ typedef struct sPAPRCPUCore {
> PowerPCCPU *threads;
> } sPAPRCPUCore;
>
> +#define TYPE_host_SPAPR_CPU_CORE "host-spapr-cpu-core"
> +#define host_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(hostsPAPRCPUCore, (obj), TYPE_host_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)
> +
> +typedef struct hostsPAPRCPUCore {
> + /*< private >*/
> + sPAPRCPUCore parent_obj;
> +
> + /*< public >*/
> + ObjectClass *cpu;
> +} hostsPAPRCPUCore;
> +#define TYPE_POWER7_SPAPR_CPU_CORE "POWER7-spapr-cpu-core"
> +#define POWER7_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(POWER7sPAPRCPUCore, (obj), TYPE_POWER7_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)
> +
> +typedef struct POWER7sPAPRCPUCore {
> + /*< private >*/
> + sPAPRCPUCore parent_obj;
> +
> + /*< public >*/
> + ObjectClass *cpu;
> +} POWER7sPAPRCPUCore;
> +
> +#define TYPE_POWER8_SPAPR_CPU_CORE "POWER8-spapr-cpu-core"
> +#define POWER8_SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj) \
> + OBJECT_CHECK(POWER8sPAPRCPUCore, (obj), TYPE_POWER8_SPAPR_CPU_CORE)
> +
> +typedef struct POWER8sPAPRCPUCore {
> + /*< private >*/
> + sPAPRCPUCore parent_obj;
> +
> + /*< public >*/
> + ObjectClass *cpu;
> +} POWER8sPAPRCPUCore;
These are all identical so should also be macro constructed as well.
I don't think there's actually any need for the structures to be
exposed in a header file either, so you should be able to do it in the
same macro that constructs the implementation.
Uh.. except if you move the ObjectClass* to the base class you won't
even need these.
> #endif
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2.1 08/12] spapr: Add CPU type specific core devices,
David Gibson <=