qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Move cpu_synchronize_all_states() into qemu


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Move cpu_synchronize_all_states() into qemu_system_reset()
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 09:31:16 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0


On 04/04/2016 06:49, David Gibson wrote:
> There are currently 3 calls to qemu_system_reset() in vl.c.  Two of them
> are immediately preceded by a cpu_synchronize_all_states9) and the
> remaining one should be.
> 
> The one which doesn't is the very first reset called directly from main().
> Without a cpu_synchronize_all_states(), kvm_vcpu_dirty is false at this
> point from the earlier cpu_synchronize_all_post_init().  That's incorrect
> because the reset path is quite likely to update the CPU state, and that
> updated state should be pushed back to KVM, not overwritten with stale
> data pushed to KVM immediately after init.
> 
> This patch moves the call to cpu_synchronize_all_states() into
> qemu_system_reset() for safety, so it is always called.  AFAICT this should
> be safe for the handful of callers outside vl.c - these all appear to be in
> places where the cpu state is already synchronized so the extra call
> will be a no-op.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  vl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> This fixes a real but on ppc - the incorrect state of kvm_vcpu_dirty
> means that an extra cpu_synchronize_state() in revised code for
> updating the MSR is not a no-op as expected and loads a stale MSR
> value, resulting in an incorrect MSR value on entry to the guest.
> 
> Therefore, I'm hoping to apply this ASAP to 2.6.
> 
> Laurent, could you please verify that this does indeed address the
> problem with an incorrect MSR on entry.
> 
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index bd81ea9..3629336 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -1745,6 +1745,8 @@ void qemu_system_reset(bool report)
>  
>      mc = current_machine ? MACHINE_GET_CLASS(current_machine) : NULL;
>  
> +    cpu_synchronize_all_states();
> +
>      if (mc && mc->reset) {
>          mc->reset();
>      } else {
> @@ -1893,7 +1895,6 @@ static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
>      }
>      if (qemu_reset_requested()) {
>          pause_all_vcpus();
> -        cpu_synchronize_all_states();
>          qemu_system_reset(VMRESET_REPORT);
>          resume_all_vcpus();
>          if (!runstate_check(RUN_STATE_RUNNING) &&
> @@ -1903,7 +1904,6 @@ static bool main_loop_should_exit(void)
>      }
>      if (qemu_wakeup_requested()) {
>          pause_all_vcpus();
> -        cpu_synchronize_all_states();
>          qemu_system_reset(VMRESET_SILENT);
>          notifier_list_notify(&wakeup_notifiers, &wakeup_reason);
>          wakeup_reason = QEMU_WAKEUP_REASON_NONE;
> 

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]