qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Modify net/socket.c to use functions from inclu


From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Modify net/socket.c to use functions from include/qemu/sockets.h
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:18:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:39:50PM +0530, Ashi wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2016 02:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:43:58PM +0530, Ashi wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday 03 May 2016 07:31 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 07:04:17PM +0530, Ashijeet Acharya wrote:
> > > > > From: Ashijeet <address@hidden>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Replaced connect()/listen()/parse_host_port() in net/socket.c
> > > > > with inet_connect()/inet_listen/inet_parse() in 
> > > > > include/qemu/sockets.h.
> > > > 
> > > > If you're going to re-work this, then I think it'd be better to
> > > > go straight to using socket_connect() / socket_listen() / socket_parse()
> > > > which are QAPI based. The inet_* function should eventually be going
> > > > away once everything is using the QAPI based socket_* functions, so
> > > > adding more usage of them is not too desirable.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Yeah sure I can do that. Also I was wondering if there is a similar 
> > > function
> > > for bind because the task listed on wiki BiteSized also expects 
> > > replacement
> > > of bind(). So maybe adding/defining socket_bind() in util/qemu-sockets.c 
> > > and
> > > the header include/qemu/sockets.h be helpful.
> > 
> > bind() is done automatically as part of the socket_listen() function
> 
> Well, I have completed replacing all the older functions with new QAPI based
> socket_*() ones. Although I am stuck at a part which uses snprintf() in
> net_socket_connect_init() function (line no. 605). The inet_ntoa() and
> ntohs() used in snprintf() are really bugging me as I am not sure how to use
> them with the new SocketAddress type sockets. The code compiles without
> snprintf() but I am not sure what effect does it have as a whole to abort
> snprintf(). I am not sure what to do with that??

It is hard to answer that without you showing what your code conversion
currently looks like...

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]