[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: do we need ordered dict?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC: do we need ordered dict? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 May 2016 09:29:23 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 05/23/2016 04:14 AM, Wei, Jiangang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found a problem about the output of 'query-version'
>
> Actually, It's as following,
> -> { "execute": "query-version" }
> <- {
> "return":{
> "qemu":{
> "micro":50,
> "minor":6,
> "major":2
> },
> "package":""
> }
> }
>
JSON has no inherent ordering of keys in a dictionary, so I see nothing
that needs to be changed here.
> The reason is that the member ''qemu" is regarded as Un-ordered dict.
> and tdb_hash() returns the same bucket(225) for both "micro" and
> "minor".
> and The "major" is bigger (481).
>
> All of the above metioned introduces the disorder for major , minor and
> micro.
And if we pick any different hash, the results might be in a different
order again. But it doesn't make it any less correct, so I don't think
an ordered dict will help anything, and would instead just cost more
overhead to write and maintain.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature