qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/33] tests: acpi: report names of expected fil


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/33] tests: acpi: report names of expected files in verbose mode
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 19:58:43 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0

On 05/17/2016 05:42 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
print expected file name if it doesn't exists if
verbose mode is enabled*. It helps to avoid running
bios-tables-test under debugger to figure out missing
file name.

*)
verbose mode is enabled if "V" env. variable is set

Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
---
  tests/bios-tables-test.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
index 0352814..9acf9ba 100644
--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
@@ -464,7 +464,6 @@ static GArray *load_expected_aml(test_data *data)
  {
      int i;
      AcpiSdtTable *sdt;
-    gchar *aml_file = NULL;
      GError *error = NULL;
      gboolean ret;

@@ -472,7 +471,9 @@ static GArray *load_expected_aml(test_data *data)
      for (i = 0; i < data->tables->len; ++i) {
          AcpiSdtTable exp_sdt;
          uint32_t signature;
+        gchar *aml_file = NULL;
          const char *ext = data->variant ? data->variant : "";
+        int j;

          sdt = &g_array_index(data->tables, AcpiSdtTable, i);

@@ -481,16 +482,23 @@ static GArray *load_expected_aml(test_data *data)

          signature = cpu_to_le32(sdt->header.signature);

-try_again:
-        aml_file = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s/%.4s%s", data_dir, data->machine,
-                                   (gchar *)&signature, ext);
-        if (data->variant && !g_file_test(aml_file, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) {
+        for (j = 2; j; j -= data->variant ? 1 : 2) {

Can you please make this code more readable ? I am kind of lost.
I do agree with what the patch tries to achieve.

Thanks,
Marcel

              g_free(aml_file);
+            aml_file = g_strdup_printf("%s/%s/%.4s%s", data_dir, data->machine,
+                                       (gchar *)&signature, ext);
+            if (g_file_test(aml_file, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS)) {
+                exp_sdt.aml_file = aml_file;
+                break;
+            }
+            if (getenv("V")) {
+                fprintf(stderr, "\nLooking for expected file '%s'\n", 
aml_file);
+            }
              ext = "";
-            goto try_again;
          }
-        exp_sdt.aml_file = aml_file;
-        g_assert(g_file_test(aml_file, G_FILE_TEST_EXISTS));
+        g_assert(exp_sdt.aml_file);
+        if (getenv("V")) {
+            fprintf(stderr, "\nUsing expected file '%s'\n", aml_file);
+        }
          ret = g_file_get_contents(aml_file, &exp_sdt.aml,
                                    &exp_sdt.aml_len, &error);
          g_assert(ret);





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]