[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] atomics: do not emit consume barrier for ato
From: |
Emilio G. Cota |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] atomics: do not emit consume barrier for atomic_rcu_read |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2016 16:06:14 -0400 |
Currently we emit a consume-load in atomic_rcu_read. This is
overkill for non-Sparc hosts, and is only useful to make
things easier for Thread Sanitizer, which as far as I understand
works best without explicit fences.
The appended leaves the consume-load in atomic_rcu_read when
compiling with Thread Sanitizer enabled, and resorts to a
relaxed load + smp_read_barrier_depends otherwise.
On an RMO host architecture, such as aarch64, the performance
improvement of this change is easily measurable. For instance,
qht-bench performs an atomic_rcu_read on every lookup. Performance
before and after applying this patch:
$ tests/qht-bench -d 5 -n 1
Before: 9.78 MT/s
After: 10.96 MT/s
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden>
---
include/qemu/atomic.h | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/atomic.h b/include/qemu/atomic.h
index 4a4f2fb..c5b6c8d 100644
--- a/include/qemu/atomic.h
+++ b/include/qemu/atomic.h
@@ -63,13 +63,20 @@
__atomic_store(ptr, &_val, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); \
} while(0)
-/* Atomic RCU operations imply weak memory barriers */
+#ifdef __SANITIZE_THREAD__
+#define atomic_rcu_read__nocheck(ptr, valptr) \
+ __atomic_load(ptr, valptr, __ATOMIC_CONSUME);
+#else
+#define atomic_rcu_read__nocheck(ptr, valptr) \
+ __atomic_load(ptr, valptr, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); \
+ smp_read_barrier_depends();
+#endif
#define atomic_rcu_read(ptr) \
({ \
QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ptr) > sizeof(void *)); \
typeof(*ptr) _val; \
- __atomic_load(ptr, &_val, __ATOMIC_CONSUME); \
+ atomic_rcu_read__nocheck(ptr, &_val); \
_val; \
})
--
2.5.0