qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/33] pc: acpi: remove AML for empty/not used G


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/33] pc: acpi: remove AML for empty/not used GPE handlers
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 15:19:26 +0200

On Wed, 25 May 2016 12:11:33 +0300
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 05/17/2016 05:42 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > ACPI spec requires GPE handlers only for GPE events
> > that hardware implements.
> > So remove AML for not supported by QEMU device model
> > events.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >   hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 17 -----------------
> >   1 file changed, 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > index 279f0d7..ff98ad8 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > @@ -2051,8 +2051,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> >       {
> >           aml_append(scope, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0006")));
> >
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L00", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -
> >           if (misc->is_piix4) {
> >               method = aml_method("_E01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> >               aml_append(method,
> > @@ -2060,8 +2058,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> >               aml_append(method, aml_call0("\\_SB.PCI0.PCNT"));
> >               aml_append(method, aml_release(aml_name("\\_SB.PCI0.BLCK")));
> >               aml_append(scope, method);
> > -        } else {
> > -            aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L01", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> >           }
> >
> >           method = aml_method("_E02", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> > @@ -2071,19 +2067,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> >           method = aml_method("_E03", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> >           aml_append(method, aml_call0(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH));
> >           aml_append(scope, method);
> > -
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L04", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L05", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L06", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L07", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L08", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L09", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0A", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0B", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0C", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0D", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0E", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> > -        aml_append(scope, aml_method("_L0F", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED));
> >       }
> >       aml_append(dsdt, scope);
> >
> >  
> 
> 
> Is this patch related to the series? Or is it a cleanup opportunity?
It's a cleanup, I'm posting it here as it's missed its merge chance at 2.6
and Michael suggested to respin it later when 2.7 dev window is open

> Thanks,
> Marcel
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]